• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氨氯地平和尼群地平单药治疗轻度和中度原发性高血压的开放性、平行、对照评估

An open, parallel, comparative evaluation of amlodipine and nitrendipine in the monotherapeutic treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension.

作者信息

Englert R, Beressem P, von Manteuffel E, Stafunsky S, Kramar M

机构信息

Veitlipp 2, Gars am Inn, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S22-4.

PMID:16296702
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists amlodipine and nitrendipine as single-agent therapy of mild to moderate hypertension were compared in an open, parallel-group study. Interim analysis of data from 74 patients (43 male, 31 female) from an expected final total of 96 patients is reported. Amlodipine normalized blood pressure (< or = 90 mm Hg) in 94.7% of patients with a mean final dose of 8.3 mg/day, compared with normalization of blood pressure in 83.3% of patients treated with nitrendipine with a mean final dose of 28.3 mg/day. Only nitrendipine produced a statistically significant increase in heart rate after 2 and 4 weeks of therapy. Nitrendipine-treated patients reported more adverse events (47.2%) than the amlodipine-treated group (26.3%). Two patients from the nitrendipine group discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events and one patient required a dose reduction. In the amlodipine-treated group, all adverse events were mild to moderate and dose reduction was required in one patient. In conclusion, although amlodipine and nitrendipine have comparable antihypertensive efficacy, in this study amlodipine was associated with fewer adverse effects.

摘要

在一项开放性平行组研究中,比较了二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂氨氯地平和尼群地平作为轻度至中度高血压单药治疗的疗效和安全性。报告了对预期最终总数96例患者中的74例患者(43例男性,31例女性)的数据进行的中期分析。氨氯地平使94.7%的患者血压正常化(≤90 mmHg),平均最终剂量为8.3 mg/天,相比之下,尼群地平治疗的患者中83.3%血压正常化,平均最终剂量为28.3 mg/天。仅尼群地平在治疗2周和4周后使心率有统计学意义的增加。尼群地平治疗的患者报告的不良事件(47.2%)多于氨氯地平治疗组(26.3%)。尼群地平组有2例患者因治疗相关不良事件停药,1例患者需要减量。在氨氯地平治疗组中,所有不良事件均为轻度至中度,1例患者需要减量。总之,尽管氨氯地平和尼群地平具有相当的降压疗效,但在本研究中氨氯地平的不良反应较少。

相似文献

1
An open, parallel, comparative evaluation of amlodipine and nitrendipine in the monotherapeutic treatment of mild and moderate essential hypertension.氨氯地平和尼群地平单药治疗轻度和中度原发性高血压的开放性、平行、对照评估
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17 Suppl 1:S22-4.
2
Parallel comparative trial of amlodipine and nitrendipine monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension.氨氯地平和尼群地平单药治疗原发性高血压患者的平行对照试验
J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Sep;16(4):S43-7.
3
Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.一项三期、为期8周、多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组临床试验的结果,该试验旨在评估坎地沙坦酯与苯磺酸氨氯地平对韩国轻至中度高血压成年人的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1924-36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.018.
4
Amlodipine compared to nitrendipine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.氨氯地平与尼群地平治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1991;67 Suppl 5:S35-7.
5
Clinic blood pressure responses to two amlodipine salt formulations, adipate and besylate, in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 8-week comparison.韩国成年轻至中度高血压患者对两种氨氯地平盐制剂(己二酸盐和苯磺酸盐)的临床血压反应:一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、为期8周的比较研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jun;27(6):728-39. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.011.
6
Middle term evaluation of amlodipine vs nitrendipine: efficacy, safety and metabolic effects in elderly hypertensive patients.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 1993;15 Suppl 1:197-210.
7
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
8
[Amlodipine in long-term treatment of mild and moderate hypertension. A multicenter study].氨氯地平用于轻中度高血压的长期治疗。一项多中心研究
Fortschr Med. 1995 Feb 20;113(5):58-62.
9
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
10
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.氨氯地平与依那普利治疗中/重度高血压的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 May;35(5):491-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04175.x.