• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审计:对一些矛盾和悖论性期望的探索。

Audit: an exploration of some tensions and paradoxical expectations.

作者信息

Nolan M, Scott G

机构信息

Research Division, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Wales, Bangor.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1993 May;18(5):759-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18050759.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18050759.x
PMID:8514931
Abstract

There can be very few nurses, at the moment, whose daily activity is not in some way influenced by the notion of audit and related concepts. Yet despite an impressive growth in the literature relating to audit, conceptual clarity on a number of key issues remains elusive. This paper suggests that there are major tensions inherent in much of the current thinking about audit. In outlining the arguments supporting our position, we term these tensions primary and secondary. The potential effects of ignoring such tensions are illustrated by reference to the development of day hospital care for older people in the United Kingdom. This is used to highlight a number of paradoxical expectations and deleterious consequences for day hospital services which have arisen from a failure adequately to address a number of fundamental questions. The lessons to be drawn are then applied to audit in general, with particular reference to services for individuals with on-going health care needs.

摘要

目前,很少有护士的日常工作不会在某种程度上受到审计观念及相关概念的影响。然而,尽管与审计相关的文献数量显著增长,但在一些关键问题上,概念的清晰度仍然难以捉摸。本文认为,当前许多关于审计的思考中存在着内在的重大矛盾。在阐述支持我们立场的论据时,我们将这些矛盾称为主要矛盾和次要矛盾。通过参考英国为老年人提供日间医院护理的发展情况,说明了忽视这些矛盾的潜在影响。这被用来突出日间医院服务中一些自相矛盾的期望和有害后果,这些后果是由于未能充分解决一些基本问题而产生的。然后将吸取的教训应用于一般的审计工作,特别是针对有持续医疗保健需求的个人的服务。

相似文献

1
Audit: an exploration of some tensions and paradoxical expectations.审计:对一些矛盾和悖论性期望的探索。
J Adv Nurs. 1993 May;18(5):759-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18050759.x.
2
Evidence-based health care: development and audit of a clinical standard for research and its impact on an NHS trust.循证医疗:一项研究临床标准的制定、审核及其对一家国民保健服务信托机构的影响
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Apr;14(4):418-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01080.x.
3
Scholarship, teaching and calculative thinking: a critique of the audit culture in UK nurse education.
Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Jan;26(1):4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.06.005. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
4
Promoting ownership in palliative care audit.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004 Mar;10(3):119-22. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2004.10.3.12467.
5
Evaluation of a model of nursing care for older patients using participatory action research in an acute medical ward.在急性内科病房中运用参与式行动研究对老年患者护理模式进行评估。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):588-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01371.x.
6
Without prejudice: results and realisation of a training needs audit in nursing homes.不妨碍:养老院培训需求审计的结果与实现情况
Nurs Older People. 2006 May;18(4):19-27. doi: 10.7748/nop2006.05.18.4.19.c2422.
7
The surveillance of nursing standards: an organisational case study.护理标准的监督:一项组织案例研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Nov;43(8):975-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.003. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
8
A qualitative study explaining nurses' perceptions of quality care for older people in long-term care settings in Ireland.一项质性研究,阐释爱尔兰长期护理机构中护士对老年人优质护理的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3):477-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01526.x.
9
Using action research in nursing practice with older people: democratizing knowledge.在老年人护理实践中运用行动研究:知识的民主化
J Clin Nurs. 2005 May;14(5):594-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01110.x.
10
Nurse champions of older people: a national audit and critical review.老年护理冠军:全国审计和批判性审查。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2012 Sep;7(3):200-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2011.00276.x. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.回顾性审核:有效临床审核的障碍与促进因素
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):23-36. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.23.
2
Incorporating patients' voices in the audit process.将患者的意见纳入审核过程。
Qual Health Care. 1997 Jun;6(2):86-91. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.2.86.