• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Involving patients in complex decisions about their care: an approach using the analytic hierarchy process.

作者信息

Dolan J G, Bordley D R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, New York 14621.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Apr;8(4):204-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02599268.

DOI:10.1007/BF02599268
PMID:8515332
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Involving patients in complex decisions about their care: an approach using the analytic hierarchy process.让患者参与有关其治疗的复杂决策：一种使用层次分析法的方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Apr;8(4):204-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02599268.
2
Are patients capable of using the analytic hierarchy process and willing to use it to help make clinical decisions?患者是否能够使用层次分析法并愿意用它来辅助做出临床决策？
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):76-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500111.
3
Assessing the Importance of Treatment Goals in Patients with Psoriasis: Analytic Hierarchy Process vs. Likert Scales.评估银屑病患者治疗目标的重要性：层次分析法与李克特量表。
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):425-437. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0300-1.
4
[Third conference on the focal point of "The patient as a partner in medical decision making process". Common decisions--an impetus for the advancement of patient participation, 23-25 May 2005 in Berlin ].["第三届“患者作为医疗决策过程中的合作伙伴”焦点会议。共同决策——推动患者参与的动力，2005年5月23日至25日于柏林举行"]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Jul;48(7):796-802. doi: 10.1007/s00103-005-1097-3.
5
Decision Aids Can Support Cancer Clinical Trials Decisions: Results of a Randomized Trial.决策辅助工具可支持癌症临床试验决策：一项随机试验的结果
Oncologist. 2016 Dec;21(12):1461-1470. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0068. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
6
Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions: use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.支持面临艰难医疗保健决策的患者：渥太华决策支持框架的应用
Can Fam Physician. 2006 Apr;52(4):476-7.
7
The potential use of decision analysis to support shared decision making in the face of uncertainty: the example of atrial fibrillation and warfarin anticoagulation.面对不确定性时决策分析在支持共同决策中的潜在应用：以心房颤动和华法林抗凝治疗为例。
Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):238-44. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.238.
8
[Objective Criteria in the Medicinal Therapy for Type II Diabetes: An Analysis of the Patients' Perspective with Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best-Worst Scaling].[2型糖尿病药物治疗的客观标准：基于层次分析法和最佳-最差尺度法的患者视角分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 May;78(5):326-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390474. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
Family and physician influence on asthma research participation decisions for adolescents: the effects of adolescent gender and research risk.家庭和医生对青少年哮喘研究参与决策的影响：青少年性别与研究风险的作用
Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e356-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2589.
10
An introduction to patient decision aids.患者决策辅助工具介绍。
Drug Ther Bull. 2012 Aug;50(8):90-2. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2012.08.0121.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making--transferring research into practice: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).共同决策——将研究转化为实践：层次分析法（AHP）
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.032. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
2
Patient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisions.结直肠癌筛查决策中的患者优先事项。
Health Expect. 2005 Dec;8(4):334-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00348.x.
3
Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values.公众参与医疗保健优先事项的设定：引出价值观的方法概述

本文引用的文献

1
The patient's role in clinical decision-making.患者在临床决策中的角色。
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Nov;93(5):718-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-93-5-718.
2
On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.关于替代疗法偏好的引出。
N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103.
3
Adding insult to injury. Usurping patients' prerogatives.雪上加霜。侵犯患者权利。
Health Expect. 1999 Dec;2(4):222-234. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00062.x.
4
Diagnostic strategies in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: patient and physician preferences.
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Oct;8(10):525-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02599632.
N Engl J Med. 1983 Apr 14;308(15):898-901. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198304143081511.
4
Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes.扩大患者在医疗护理中的参与度。对患者治疗结果的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 1985 Apr;102(4):520-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-520.
5
Decision analysis.决策分析
N Engl J Med. 1987 Jan 29;316(5):250-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198701293160505.
6
Two models of implementing informed consent.实施知情同意的两种模式。
Arch Intern Med. 1988 Jun;148(6):1385-9.
7
Science, ethics, and the making of clinical decisions. Implications for risk factor intervention.科学、伦理与临床决策的制定。对风险因素干预的启示。
JAMA. 1988 Jun 3;259(21):3161-7.
8
Medical decision making using the analytic hierarchy process: choice of initial antimicrobial therapy for acute pyelonephritis.运用层次分析法进行医学决策：急性肾盂肾炎初始抗菌治疗的选择
Med Decis Making. 1989 Jan-Mar;9(1):51-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900109.
9
The analytic hierarchy process in medical decision making: a tutorial.医学决策中的层次分析法：教程
Med Decis Making. 1989 Jan-Mar;9(1):40-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900108.
10
A counterpoint to the analytic hierarchy process.
Med Decis Making. 1989 Jan-Mar;9(1):57-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900110.