Frederick C B
Rohm and Haas Company, Toxicology Department, Spring House, PA 19477.
Toxicol Lett. 1993 May;68(1-2):159-75. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(93)90128-k.
Analysis of the default cancer risk assessment methodology suggests that the confidence interval usually associated with the prediction of an upper bound on risk underestimates the uncertainty in the risk estimate. This underestimate of uncertainty is based on the use of a large number of policy decisions or professional judgements that are incorporated into the methodology as exact values with no estimate of error. An alternative approach is to develop a comprehensive biologically based risk assessment that provides scientific data to substitute for many of the policy decisions of the default methodology.
对默认癌症风险评估方法的分析表明,通常与风险上限预测相关的置信区间低估了风险估计中的不确定性。这种对不确定性的低估是基于大量政策决策或专业判断的使用,这些决策或判断在方法中被作为精确值纳入,而没有误差估计。另一种方法是开发一种全面的基于生物学的风险评估,提供科学数据以替代默认方法中的许多政策决策。