Holecek B U, Ackerman A B
Dermatopathology Unit, New York University Medical Center, New York 10016.
Am J Dermatopathol. 1993 Jun;15(3):235-47; discussion 248-55.
This essay is a critique of a revolutionary hypothesis, and of the language used to frame it, that offers a novel interpretation for the dynamics of the follicular cycle by distinguishing, distinctly, germinative cells in the bulge from matrical cells in the bulb. Curiously, this intriguing "bulge-activation hypothesis" elicited practically no response in the scientific literature, and our critique is designed to rectify that.
本文是对一个革命性假说及其阐述语言的批判。该假说通过明确区分毛囊隆突部的生发细胞和毛球部的基质细胞,为卵泡周期动力学提供了一种全新的解释。奇怪的是,这一引人入胜的“隆突部激活假说”在科学文献中几乎没有引起任何反响,而我们的批判旨在纠正这一情况。