• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有多少专家?

How many specialists?

作者信息

Jennett B

出版信息

Lancet. 1979 Mar 17;1(8116):594-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91018-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91018-3
PMID:85176
Abstract

The need for specialists cannot be adequately assessed on the basis of current practice and an estimated case-load (based on prevalence/population ratio). Specialists should declare which patients can or cannot be expected to benefit from their treatment, and they should consider the consequences of underprovision of specialist services. Specialists should also decide how much of what they normally do might equally well be carried out by generalists using the knowledge of specialists. Only then can the appropriate level of provision for various specialties be assessed, and effective deployment of the resources provided ensured.

摘要

基于当前的实践和估计的病例量(基于患病率/人口比率),无法充分评估对专科医生的需求。专科医生应声明哪些患者有望从其治疗中受益或无法受益,并应考虑专科服务供应不足的后果。专科医生还应决定,他们通常所做的工作中有多少可以由通科医生利用专科医生的知识同样出色地完成。只有这样,才能评估为各个专科提供的适当水平,并确保有效配置所提供的资源。

相似文献

1
How many specialists?有多少专家?
Lancet. 1979 Mar 17;1(8116):594-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91018-3.
2
Task Force 4: The relationship between cardiovascular specialists and generalists.特别工作组4:心血管专科医生与全科医生之间的关系。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Aug;24(2):304-12. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90281-x.
3
Generalists or specialists--who does it better?全科医生还是专科医生——谁做得更好?
Physician Exec. 1998 Jan-Feb;24(1):40-5.
4
Administrative centralization versus decentralization and the role of generalists and specialists.行政集权与分权以及通科医生和专科医生的角色。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1968 Sep;58(9):1620-32. doi: 10.2105/ajph.58.9.1620.
5
Re-examining the roles of generalists and specialists in healthcare.重新审视医疗保健领域通才和专家的角色。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2023 Mar 30;52(3):149-153. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022434.
6
A statement of principles: toward improved care of older patients in surgical and medical specialties.原则声明:致力于改善外科和医学专科中老年患者的护理
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Jun;48(6):699-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04733.x.
7
Improving ICU-Based Palliative Care Delivery: A Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Survey of Critical Care Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs.改善基于重症监护病房的姑息治疗服务:一项关于重症监护临床医生态度和信念的多中心、多学科调查。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e372-e378. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002099.
8
Open access plans: will family physicians be left behind?开放获取计划:家庭医生会被落下吗?
Fam Pract Manag. 1997 Mar;4(3):58-60, 63-4, 67.
9
Word of mouth and physician referrals still drive health care provider choice.口碑和医生推荐仍然是影响医疗服务提供者选择的因素。
Res Brief. 2008 Dec(9):1-8.
10
Critical care medicine for the 21st century.21世纪的重症医学。
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):436-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00040.

引用本文的文献

1
How many beds do we really need--for example, in neurosurgery?我们究竟需要多少张床位——比如在神经外科领域?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Mar 14;282(6267):903-4.
2
Neurosurgical resources and transfer policies for head injuries.颅脑损伤的神经外科资源与转运政策
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Jun 4;286(6380):1791-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6380.1791.
3
General medicine in the 'eighties.八十年代的普通医学。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Aug 30;293(6546):547-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6546.547.