Davie S J, Whiting K L, Gould B J
Department of Biochemistry, Kingston Hospital, Kingston-Upon-Thames, Surrey, UK.
Ann Clin Biochem. 1993 May;30 ( Pt 3):260-4. doi: 10.1177/000456329303000306.
The high degree of individuality in the fructosamine assay has been ascribed to non-specific interferences in the assay. To investigate this, we measured the biological variability of 10 non-diabetic subjects using the fructosamine assay, the new fructosamine plus assay, glycated albumin and glycated total plasma proteins by affinity chromatography. The total variation of the two fructosamine assays was half that of the affinity chromatography assays. This was mainly due to the greater analytical imprecision of the affinity chromatography assays. The resulting high index of heterogeneity for both affinity methods makes it difficult to assess the significance of changes in serial results. The within-subject variation made a small contribution to the total variation for all the assays, and was particularly low for the fructosamine assays. This suggests that any non-specific component makes a constant contribution to the measured fructosamine activity in non-diabetic subjects. The fructosamine assays therefore have significant advantages over the affinity chromatography methods as indices of medium-term glycaemic control.
果糖胺检测中高度的个体差异归因于检测中的非特异性干扰。为了对此进行研究,我们使用果糖胺检测、新的果糖胺加检测、糖化白蛋白以及通过亲和色谱法检测糖化总血浆蛋白,对10名非糖尿病受试者的生物学变异性进行了测量。两种果糖胺检测的总变异是亲和色谱法检测的一半。这主要是由于亲和色谱法检测的分析不精密度更高。两种亲和方法所产生的高异质性指数使得难以评估系列结果变化的显著性。受试者内变异对所有检测的总变异贡献较小,对于果糖胺检测尤其低。这表明任何非特异性成分对非糖尿病受试者中所测得的果糖胺活性都有恒定贡献。因此,作为中期血糖控制指标,果糖胺检测相对于亲和色谱法具有显著优势。