Jansen R T, Bullock D G, Vassault A, Baadenhuijsen H, De Leenheer A, Dumont G, de Verdier C H, Zender R
Department of Clinical Chemistry, St Anna Hospital, Geldrop, The Netherlands.
Ann Clin Biochem. 1993 May;30 ( Pt 3):304-14. doi: 10.1177/000456329303000313.
Two lyophilized control sera were distributed through seven national external quality assessment schemes in six European countries--Belgium, Switzerland, France, The Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom--participated in the study. The results for 17 routine analytes were obtained from almost 5000 laboratories for the two sera. The organizers of the schemes were asked to process the results according to a common outlier removal procedure, and submit method-related data if available. The two sera were also distributed through the external/internal scheme of The Netherlands, and the within-laboratory standard deviations calculated in this scheme have been used in a scaling procedure for the external mean values and between-laboratory standard deviations of the participating countries. The results show remarkable agreement in the national mean values for practically all analytes, but considerable differences in the between-laboratory variation. Data from comparable method groups was obtained for 12 analytes from Belgium, France, The Netherlands and the UK. Though revealing some specific differences between methods and countries, the method-related data are generally in agreement with the all-method data. In this study reference method values were only available for cholesterol. The high degree of agreement found suggests, however, that mutual recognition of all-method mean values in national schemes could be acceptable, especially for analytes for which reliable reference methods are not available. The major element of variation is between-laboratory rather than between-country.
两份冻干对照血清被分发给六个欧洲国家(比利时、瑞士、法国、荷兰、瑞典和英国)的七个国家外部质量评估计划参与了这项研究。从近5000个实验室获得了这两份血清17种常规分析物的结果。要求各计划的组织者按照共同的异常值去除程序处理结果,并在可能的情况下提交与方法相关的数据。这两份血清还通过荷兰的外部/内部计划进行分发,该计划中计算出的实验室内标准差已用于对参与国的外部均值和实验室间标准差进行缩放处理。结果表明,几乎所有分析物的国家均值都有显著一致性,但实验室间的差异相当大。从比利时、法国、荷兰和英国获得了12种分析物的可比方法组的数据。尽管揭示了方法和国家之间的一些具体差异,但与方法相关的数据总体上与所有方法的数据一致。在本研究中,仅胆固醇有参考方法值。然而,发现的高度一致性表明,国家计划中对所有方法均值的相互认可可能是可以接受的,特别是对于没有可靠参考方法的分析物。变异的主要因素是实验室间而非国家间。