Skrandies W
Physiological Institute, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 1993;93(3):516-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00229366.
In the present study, we investigated topographical differences between monocularly and binocularly evoked potential fields related to the retinal location and spatial frequency of grating stimuli. Electrical brain activity was recorded in 18 healthy adults using an array of 21 electrodes over the occipital areas. Vertical black-and-white grating patterns of different spatial frequencies were presented with central fixation or lateralized to the left or right hemiretina. Computation of global field power determined component latency. Topographic characteristics of the field distributions were examined at the individual component latency for each subject using statistical comparisons between experimental conditions. The strength of the potential fields was significantly larger with binocular stimuli, whereas no effects were observed when comparing component latencies. Pronounced differences occurred in the spatial distribution of electrical brain activity: with 2.5 cycles/deg, large, significant topographic differences between monocularly and binocularly evoked activity were obtained. The potential fields showed a more anterior and more lateralized component distribution with binocular than monocular stimuli. In addition, when the gratings were presented binocularly, significant topographic differences were observed when low and high spatial frequency stimuli were compared. Our results suggest that the relationship between the topography of evoked components and retinal stimulus location and spatial frequency is different for monocular and binocular stimuli, indicating that binocular information processing triggers different neuronal processes in the human visual cortex.
在本研究中,我们调查了与光栅刺激的视网膜位置和空间频率相关的单眼和双眼诱发电位场之间的地形差异。使用枕区上的21个电极阵列记录了18名健康成年人的脑电活动。呈现不同空间频率的垂直黑白光栅图案,使其中心固定或偏向左侧或右侧半视网膜。通过计算全局场功率来确定成分潜伏期。使用实验条件之间的统计比较,在每个受试者的个体成分潜伏期检查场分布的地形特征。双眼刺激时电位场的强度明显更大,而比较成分潜伏期时未观察到影响。脑电活动的空间分布出现了明显差异:在2.5周/度时,单眼和双眼诱发活动之间获得了大的、显著的地形差异。与单眼刺激相比,双眼刺激时电位场的成分分布更靠前且更偏向外侧。此外,当双眼呈现光栅时,比较低空间频率和高空间频率刺激时观察到了显著的地形差异。我们的结果表明,单眼和双眼刺激诱发成分的地形与视网膜刺激位置和空间频率之间的关系不同,这表明双眼信息处理在人类视觉皮层中触发了不同的神经元过程。