Barbaro G, Di Lorenzo G
Dipartimento di Medicina di Urgenza, Università degli Studi, La Sapienza, Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy.
Ital J Gastroenterol. 1995 May;27(4):175-80.
The aim of this study was to assess the role and therapeutic efficacy of two azole antifungal drugs, fluconazole and itraconazole, in the treatment of endoscopically-diagnosed Candida oesophagitis in patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). The study considered 120 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-positive patients (67 males and 53 females, mean age 27 +/- 5) at their first episode of oesophageal candidiasis diagnosed by endoscopy (Kodsi's grade II endoscopic classification). The patients were double-blindly randomized into 2 groups of 60 patients each according to the pharmacological therapy administered: a) the patients in the first group received fluconazole (100 mg b.i.d. per os); b) the patients in the second group received itraconazole (100 mg b.i.d. per os). In order to evaluate the efficacy of the pharmacological therapy, a clinical examination was performed every week up to the end of the follow-up period (2 months); endoscopic examination was performed at the end of pharmacological treatment (3 weeks). All patients selected for the study gave their informed consent. Complete remission of endoscopic lesions was observed in 45 patients (75%) in the fluconazole group and in 23 patients (38%) in the itraconazole group (p < 0.001); partial remission of endoscopic lesions was observed in 15 patients (25%) in the fluconazole group and in 28 patients (47%) in the itraconazole group (p < 0.05). No response was observed in 9 patients (15%) in the itraconazole group. Complete clinical remission was observed in 47 patients (78%) in the fluconazole group and in 44 patients (73%) in the itraconazole group (p = n.s.); partial clinical remission was observed in 13 patients (22%) in the fluconazole group and in 12 patients (20%) in the itraconazole group (p =- m.s.). No clinical response was observed in 4 patients (7%) in the itraconazole group. No side-effects worthy of note were observed in the patients of either treatment group. The results of this study demonstrated that fluconazole is associated with higher rates of endoscopic and clinical cure than itraconazole, with a statistically significant difference as regards endoscopic cure. Both drugs appear to be safe and well tolerated. Nevertheless, further controlled clinical investigations are needed to improve our knowledge of the therapeutic action of antifungal drugs in the treatment of Candida oesophagitis in HIV disease.
本研究旨在评估两种唑类抗真菌药物氟康唑和伊曲康唑在治疗获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)患者内镜诊断的念珠菌食管炎中的作用及治疗效果。该研究纳入了120例人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性患者(67例男性和53例女性,平均年龄27±5岁),他们首次因内镜诊断为食管念珠菌病(Kodsi二级内镜分类)。根据所给予的药物治疗,患者被双盲随机分为两组,每组60例:a)第一组患者接受氟康唑(口服100mg,每日两次);b)第二组患者接受伊曲康唑(口服100mg,每日两次)。为了评估药物治疗的效果,在随访期结束(2个月)前每周进行一次临床检查;在药物治疗结束时(3周)进行内镜检查。所有入选本研究的患者均签署了知情同意书。氟康唑组45例患者(75%)内镜病变完全缓解,伊曲康唑组23例患者(38%)内镜病变完全缓解(p<0.001);氟康唑组15例患者(25%)内镜病变部分缓解,伊曲康唑组28例患者(47%)内镜病变部分缓解(p<0.05)。伊曲康唑组9例患者(15%)无反应。氟康唑组47例患者(78%)临床完全缓解,伊曲康唑组44例患者(73%)临床完全缓解(p=无统计学意义);氟康唑组13例患者(22%)临床部分缓解,伊曲康唑组12例患者(20%)临床部分缓解(p=无统计学意义)。伊曲康唑组4例患者(7%)无临床反应。两个治疗组的患者均未观察到值得注意的副作用。本研究结果表明,与伊曲康唑相比,氟康唑的内镜及临床治愈率更高,在内镜治愈方面存在统计学显著差异。两种药物似乎都安全且耐受性良好。然而,需要进一步的对照临床研究来增进我们对抗真菌药物在治疗HIV疾病患者念珠菌食管炎中治疗作用的认识。