Suppr超能文献

立体显微镜检查、胶片放射摄影、显微放射摄影以及牙齿切片的肉眼检查作为咬合面龋齿诊断的验证方法。

Stereomicroscopy, film radiography, microradiography and naked-eye inspection of tooth sections as validation for occlusal caries diagnosis.

作者信息

Hintze H, Wenzel A, Larsen M J

机构信息

Department of Oral Radiology, Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Caries Res. 1995;29(5):359-63. doi: 10.1159/000262093.

Abstract

In establishing a trustworthy validation for occlusal caries lesions, various methods have been used after sectioning teeth. The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of four such methods: stereomicroscopy (SM), film radiography (FR), microradiography (MR) and naked-eye inspection (NEI) for the detection of caries in occlusal tooth surfaces. Further, the interobserver agreement between three observers' registrations of occlusal caries by these methods was evaluated. The material consisted of 18 unerupted third molars known to be sound with respect to caries, as they were embedded in bone prior to removal, and 20 erupted third molars with an unknown 'true state of disease'. The teeth were serially sectioned, coded and examined blindly for occlusal caries by three independent observers by the four validation methods under study. SM was demonstrated to be the only method by which all observers correctly identified all 18 unerupted teeth as sound, resulting in a specificity of 1.00. By the other three methods, 1 or more of the unerupted teeth were falsely classified as carious. In the erupted teeth, 73, 58, 52 and 32%, respectively, of the teeth were determined carious by SM, MR, NEI and FR. As it was possible by SM to detect caries in nearly three quarters of the erupted teeth and at the same time to identify all unerupted teeth as sound, this method seemed to be the most trustworthy of the validation methods under study.

摘要

在建立可靠的咬合面龋损验证方法时,牙齿切片后采用了多种方法。本研究的目的是比较四种方法的准确性:体视显微镜检查(SM)、胶片射线照相术(FR)、显微射线照相术(MR)和肉眼检查(NEI),以检测咬合面的龋齿。此外,还评估了三位观察者使用这些方法对咬合面龋齿进行记录时的观察者间一致性。材料包括18颗未萌出的第三磨牙,在拔除前埋于骨中,已知无龋齿;以及20颗已萌出的第三磨牙,其“疾病真实状态”未知。牙齿被连续切片、编码,并由三位独立观察者使用所研究的四种验证方法对咬合面龋齿进行盲法检查。结果表明,SM是唯一一种所有观察者都能正确将所有18颗未萌出牙齿判定为无龋的方法,特异性为1.00。使用其他三种方法时,有1颗或更多未萌出牙齿被错误分类为龋齿。在已萌出的牙齿中,通过SM、MR、NEI和FR分别判定为龋齿的牙齿比例为73%、58%、52%和32%。由于SM能够检测出近四分之三已萌出牙齿中的龋齿,同时又能将所有未萌出牙齿判定为无龋,因此该方法似乎是所研究的验证方法中最可靠的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验