Vijayan Aswathy Kallaliel, Jo Shiana, Mathew Benila, Vidyadharan Mathew, Nair Aparna M
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):156-161. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_858_20. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
Radiography plays an important role in detection of interproximal caries. The aim of study is to compare diagnostic ability of conventional film and photostimulable phosphor (PSP) with direct measurement using stereomicroscope in detecting proximal caries.
In this descriptive study - diagnostic test evaluation, 200 proximal surfaces of 100 extracted human posterior teeth were radiographed with dental X-ray unit. Evaluation of conventional and digital radiographs was performed twice by three observers. Carious lesions were classified based on a four-point scale (R0-R3) suggested by Abesi . Weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess intra- and interobserver agreement for each image set. Indices of diagnostic ability calculation were based on the first readings of the three observers. The scores were compared with the histological gold standard using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate diagnostic ability.
Intraobserver kappa coefficients calculated for each observer for each method of detecting caries ranged from 0.914 to 0.956. Interobserver kappa coefficients for each image set ranged from 0.8788 to 0.9583. The sensitivity and specificity of film for the first observer were 77.5% and 78.3% and for PSP were 77.5% and 80%, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant results ( > 0.05) between Az values for the two detection methods.
PSP plate should be preferred over conventional films in detecting cavitated proximal caries. Further studies with more noncavitated proximal surfaces are required to conclusively establish the diagnostic ability of PSP over conventional film.
X线摄影在邻面龋检测中起着重要作用。本研究的目的是比较传统胶片和光激励荧光体(PSP)与使用体视显微镜直接测量在检测邻面龋方面的诊断能力。
在这项描述性研究——诊断试验评估中,用牙科X线设备对100颗拔除的人类后牙的200个邻面进行了X线摄影。三名观察者对传统和数字X线片进行了两次评估。根据阿贝西提出的四点量表(R0-R3)对龋损进行分类。计算加权kappa系数以评估每个图像集的观察者内和观察者间一致性。诊断能力计算指标基于三名观察者的首次读数。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析将分数与组织学金标准进行比较,以评估诊断能力。
每种检测龋齿方法的每个观察者计算出的观察者内kappa系数范围为0.914至0.956。每个图像集的观察者间kappa系数范围为0.8788至0.9583。第一位观察者对胶片的敏感性和特异性分别为77.5%和78.3%,对PSP的敏感性和特异性分别为77.5%和80%。ROC分析显示,两种检测方法的Az值之间没有统计学显著结果(>0.05)。
在检测已形成空洞的邻面龋时,PSP板应优于传统胶片。需要对更多未形成空洞的邻面进行进一步研究,以最终确定PSP相对于传统胶片的诊断能力。