• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床及实验室影像学龋齿诊断。对同一组牙齿的研究。

Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth.

作者信息

Hintze H, Wenze A

机构信息

Department of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996 Jun;25(3):115-8. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.25.3.9084258.

DOI:10.1259/dmfr.25.3.9084258
PMID:9084258
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of radiographs obtained both in vivo and in vitro of the same teeth for the detection of occlusal and approximal caries.

METHODS

Pre- and post-extraction radiographs were obtained of 130 teeth, mostly third molars. The two sets of radiographs were assessed by four independent observers using a five-level confidence scale. Caries was validated histologically after serial sectioning. A positive diagnosis was defined as caries present in dentine occlusally and in enamel or deeper approximally. The diagnostic accuracy was expressed by ROC curve areas.

RESULTS

For occlusal caries, the average ROC curve area was 0.767 in the in vivo and 0.826 in the in vitro radiographs. The corresponding areas for approximal caries were 0.707 and 0.735, respectively. The differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The outcome of radiographic caries diagnosis in the clinic appeared comparable with that obtained in the laboratory.

摘要

目的

比较同一牙齿在体内和体外拍摄的X线片对咬合面和邻面龋的诊断准确性。

方法

对130颗牙齿(主要是第三磨牙)在拔牙前和拔牙后拍摄X线片。由四名独立观察者使用五级置信度量表对两组X线片进行评估。在连续切片后通过组织学方法验证龋齿情况。阳性诊断定义为咬合面牙本质和邻面釉质或更深层存在龋齿。诊断准确性用ROC曲线面积表示。

结果

对于咬合面龋,体内X线片的平均ROC曲线面积为0.767,体外X线片为0.826。邻面龋的相应面积分别为0.707和0.735。差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

临床中X线片龋齿诊断结果与实验室结果相当。

相似文献

1
Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth.临床及实验室影像学龋齿诊断。对同一组牙齿的研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996 Jun;25(3):115-8. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.25.3.9084258.
2
In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.D速和E速胶片X线摄影、RVG及Visualix数字X线摄影用于检测釉质邻面和牙本质咬合面龋损的体外比较
Caries Res. 1994;28(5):363-7. doi: 10.1159/000262002.
3
Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.四种存储磷光体系统和E速X线片龋齿检测的准确性
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 May;31(3):170-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600686.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.两种软件模式对来自四个牙科系统的数字化X线片龋损检测的诊断准确性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Mar;35(2):78-82. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/50356588.
5
Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.验证方法对龋齿诊断准确性的影响。六种数字射线照相系统与两种传统射线照相系统的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002 Jan;31(1):44-9. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600645.
6
A comparison of radiographic occlusal and approximal caries diagnoses made by 240 dentists.240名牙医对X线片上咬合面和邻面龋的诊断比较。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2001 Oct;59(5):285-9. doi: 10.1080/000163501750541147.
7
Impact of the validator and the validation method on the outcome of occlusal caries diagnosis.验证器和验证方法对咬合面龋诊断结果的影响。
Caries Res. 1994;28(5):373-7. doi: 10.1159/000262004.
8
Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.显微镜检查与X线摄影作为X线龋病诊断金标准的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 May;28(3):182-5. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600438.
9
Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.瑞典和中国高年级牙科学生使用传统胶片和数字X线片检测邻面龋的诊断性能比较。
Swed Dent J. 2013;37(2):79-85.
10
Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images.使用增强数字图像诊断咬合面龋的准确性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jul;33(4):236-40. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/94305126.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing the Benchmark: Establishing a Gold Standard for the Evaluation of AI Caries Diagnostics.制定基准:建立人工智能龋齿诊断评估的金标准。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 29;13(13):3846. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133846.
2
Effect of Amalgam Restorations and Operation Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries Detection Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描检测龋齿时,银汞合金修复体和操作参数对诊断准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
Scanning. 2021 Aug 16;2021:2679012. doi: 10.1155/2021/2679012. eCollection 2021.
3
Radiographic modalities for diagnosis of caries in a historical perspective: from film to machine-intelligence supported systems.
从历史角度看龋病诊断的影像学方法:从胶片到人工智能支持的系统。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Jul 1;50(5):20210010. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210010. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of a direct digital radiographic-CMOS image with four types of filtered images for the detection of occlusal caries.评估直接数字化射线摄影 - CMOS图像与四种类型的滤波图像用于检测咬合面龋的诊断准确性。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jan 28;9(1):206-214. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_934_19. eCollection 2020 Jan.
5
Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols.不同协议扫描 Promax 3D 锥形束 CT 图像对髁突骨缺损的检测准确性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(5):20120241. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120241. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
6
Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities.五种不同成像方式获取的窝沟龋深度测量值。
J Digit Imaging. 2011 Oct;24(5):804-13. doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9355-9.
7
A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of in vivo and in vitro photostimulable phosphor digital images in the detection of occlusal caries lesions.比较体内和体外光激励磷光数字图像在检测咬合面龋损中的诊断准确性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Jan;39(1):17-22. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/91657756.