• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病住院治疗。一、公立与私立医疗服务体系的比较。

Psychiatric hospitalization. I. Comparison of public and private delivery systems.

作者信息

Fowler D R, Mayfield D G

出版信息

Dis Nerv Syst. 1977 May;38(5):314-7.

PMID:852365
Abstract

The effect of financial requirements for admission on the delivery of psychiatric treatment services was studied by comparing all patients admitted to the psychiatric services of a public and a private general hospital, serving geographically similar areas. Patients admitted to these two services (both staffed by the same Department of Psychiatry) were compared in a variety of factors relating to admission determinants, diagnosis, length of hospitalization, and type of treatment. The two patient groups differed in a number offactors, including presenting problems, diagnoses, and.psychological concept of their illnesses. The public hospital patients were less likely to receive somatic treatments (especially psychotropic drugs) and more likely to be hospitalized for longer periods than were the private hospital patients. These findings, although inconclusive because of social class, age, and sex variables, suggest that financial requirements for admission affect the intensity and expeditiousness of the treatment.

摘要

通过比较一家公立医院和一家私立综合医院精神科收治的所有患者,研究了入院财务要求对精神科治疗服务提供的影响,这两家医院服务的地理区域相似。对这两项服务(均由同一精神科负责)收治的患者在与入院决定因素、诊断、住院时间和治疗类型相关的各种因素方面进行了比较。两组患者在一些因素上存在差异,包括呈现的问题、诊断以及对自身疾病的心理认知。与私立医院患者相比,公立医院患者接受躯体治疗(尤其是精神药物)的可能性较小,住院时间更长。尽管由于社会阶层、年龄和性别变量,这些发现尚无定论,但表明入院财务要求会影响治疗的强度和速度。

相似文献

1
Psychiatric hospitalization. I. Comparison of public and private delivery systems.精神病住院治疗。一、公立与私立医疗服务体系的比较。
Dis Nerv Syst. 1977 May;38(5):314-7.
2
Psychiatric hospitalization. II. Effect of social class and delivery systems.精神病住院治疗。二、社会阶层和分娩系统的影响。
Dis Nerv Syst. 1977 May;38(5):320-3.
3
[Brief psychiatric hospitalization: a possible way, a strategy to evolve?].[短期精神科住院治疗:一种可行的方式,一种发展策略?]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):223-31.
4
[Value of a consultation center and crisis intervention in addressing psychiatric disorders in the perinatal period].[咨询中心及危机干预在解决围产期精神障碍问题中的价值]
Encephale. 2002 Jan-Feb;28(1):71-6.
5
Patterns of admission to acute psychiatric in-patient facilities: a national survey in Italy.意大利急性精神科住院机构的收治模式:一项全国性调查
Psychol Med. 2009 Mar;39(3):485-96. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003607. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
6
[Discharge curve among psychiatric patients after admission and risk factors associated with long stay based on "patient survey"].[基于“患者调查”的精神科患者入院后出院曲线及与长期住院相关的危险因素]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2006;108(9):891-905.
7
[Which wards or hospital departments admit mentally ill patients? An analysis of hospital admissions recorded by the German Statutory Sickness Insurance Body in the light of the introduction of German budgeting practice].哪些病房或医院科室收治精神疾病患者?根据德国预算编制实践的引入情况,对德国法定医疗保险机构记录的医院入院情况进行分析
Gesundheitswesen. 2003 Aug-Sep;65(8-9):486-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42389.
8
The influence of neighborhood environment on treatment continuity and rehospitalization in dually diagnosed patients discharged from acute inpatient care.社区环境对急性住院治疗后出院的双重诊断患者治疗连续性和再次住院的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;166(11):1258-68. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08111667. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
Migration, mental health and costs consequences in Romania.罗马尼亚的移民、心理健康与成本后果
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Mar;10(1):43-50.
10
Are there racial differences in the way patients with psychotic disorders are treated at their first hospitalization?
Psychol Med. 2004 May;34(4):705-18. doi: 10.1017/S0033291703001363.

引用本文的文献

1
ECT use in the public sector: California.公共部门中电休克疗法的使用:加利福尼亚州
Psychiatr Q. 1990 Summer;61(2):97-103. doi: 10.1007/BF01064910.