• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病住院治疗。二、社会阶层和分娩系统的影响。

Psychiatric hospitalization. II. Effect of social class and delivery systems.

作者信息

Mayfield D G, Fowler D R

出版信息

Dis Nerv Syst. 1977 May;38(5):320-3.

PMID:856563
Abstract

The effects of social class and delivery system on admission and behavioral variables, diagnosis, treatment, and length of hospitalization were studied by comparing patients admitted over a one-year period to the psychiatric services of a public and a private general hospital, staffed by the same Department of Psychiatry. Patients were of similar age and sex and were matched by social class. Crisis-precipitated admissions and affective-disorder diagnoses varied with social class irrespective of treatment facility. Patients diagnosed as schizophrenic were more common in the upper classes at the private facility and the lower classes at the public facility. Somatic treatments and length of hospitalization also varied according to social class as well as delivery system. The results of this study imply that economic differences between public and private delivery systems operate to select patients for admission and affect expeditiousness of treatment, perhaps to the detriment of patients in both systems.

摘要

通过比较在一年时间内入住由同一精神科部门配备人员的一家公立医院和一家私立综合医院精神科服务的患者,研究了社会阶层和医疗服务体系对入院情况、行为变量、诊断、治疗及住院时长的影响。患者年龄和性别相仿,并按社会阶层进行了匹配。无论治疗机构如何,因危机而入院以及情感障碍诊断均因社会阶层而异。被诊断为精神分裂症的患者在私立机构的上层社会阶层中更为常见,而在公立医院的下层社会阶层中更为常见。躯体治疗和住院时长也因社会阶层以及医疗服务体系而异。这项研究的结果表明,公立和私立医疗服务体系之间的经济差异在选择入院患者方面发挥作用,并影响治疗的及时性,这可能对两个体系中的患者都不利。

相似文献

1
Psychiatric hospitalization. II. Effect of social class and delivery systems.精神病住院治疗。二、社会阶层和分娩系统的影响。
Dis Nerv Syst. 1977 May;38(5):320-3.
2
Psychiatric hospitalization. I. Comparison of public and private delivery systems.精神病住院治疗。一、公立与私立医疗服务体系的比较。
Dis Nerv Syst. 1977 May;38(5):314-7.
3
[Value of a consultation center and crisis intervention in addressing psychiatric disorders in the perinatal period].[咨询中心及危机干预在解决围产期精神障碍问题中的价值]
Encephale. 2002 Jan-Feb;28(1):71-6.
4
[Brief psychiatric hospitalization: a possible way, a strategy to evolve?].[短期精神科住院治疗:一种可行的方式,一种发展策略?]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):223-31.
5
Patterns of admission to acute psychiatric in-patient facilities: a national survey in Italy.意大利急性精神科住院机构的收治模式:一项全国性调查
Psychol Med. 2009 Mar;39(3):485-96. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003607. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
6
[Discharge curve among psychiatric patients after admission and risk factors associated with long stay based on "patient survey"].[基于“患者调查”的精神科患者入院后出院曲线及与长期住院相关的危险因素]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2006;108(9):891-905.
7
Excess mortality among long-stay psychiatric patients in Northern Finland.芬兰北部长期住院精神科患者的超额死亡率。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Jun;38(6):297-304. doi: 10.1007/s00127-003-0635-2.
8
Sectorized psychiatry. A methodological study of the effects of reorganization on patients treated at a mental hospital.分区精神病学。一项关于重组对精神病院患者治疗效果的方法学研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1983;304:1-127.
9
The influence of neighborhood environment on treatment continuity and rehospitalization in dually diagnosed patients discharged from acute inpatient care.社区环境对急性住院治疗后出院的双重诊断患者治疗连续性和再次住院的影响。
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;166(11):1258-68. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08111667. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
10
[Which wards or hospital departments admit mentally ill patients? An analysis of hospital admissions recorded by the German Statutory Sickness Insurance Body in the light of the introduction of German budgeting practice].哪些病房或医院科室收治精神疾病患者?根据德国预算编制实践的引入情况,对德国法定医疗保险机构记录的医院入院情况进行分析
Gesundheitswesen. 2003 Aug-Sep;65(8-9):486-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-42389.