Suppr超能文献

两种不同的肝素涂层体外循环系统在血液激活方面的差异。

Disparity in blood activation by two different heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass systems.

作者信息

Moen O, Fosse E, Brockmeier V, Andersson C, Mollnes T E, Høgåsen K, Venge P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Institute for Experimental Research, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Nov;60(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00777-i.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have indicated reduced "blood activation" in heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass systems. The present study compares the effect of two different heparin coatings on different blood activation indices.

METHODS

Low-risk patients (n = 40) were randomized to coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass with surfaces coated entirely by either the Duraflo II heparin coat or the Carmeda Biological Active Surface, or with identical uncoated equipment. In all cases, a standard systemic heparin dosage was used. Complement activation (C3 activation products C3bc and C3a and formation of fluid phase terminal SC5b-9 complement complex), neutrophil activation (lactoferrin and myeloperoxidase), and lytic inhibitors (vitronectin and clusterin) were quantified during cardiopulmonary bypass and 6 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Heparin coating by either method reduced the formation of terminal SC5b-9 complement complex and the release of lactoferrin and myeloperoxidase compared with uncoated systems. Lactoferrin and myeloperoxidase levels increased significantly during cardiopulmonary bypass in the Duraflo II group, whereas no significant increase was observed in the Carmeda Biological Active Surface group. The least formation of terminal SC5b-9 complement complex and neutrophil activation was observed with the Maxima Carmeda Biological Active Surface-coated equipment. The vitronectin and clusterin concentrations were significantly less reduced in the Duraflo II compared with the control group. This study underlines the importance of terminal SC5b-9 complement complex as a suitable marker in the evaluation of complement activation during cardiopulmonary bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

Both heparin coatings reduce blood activation, probably more so with Carmeda Biological Active Surface than with Duraflo II.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,肝素涂层体外循环系统中“血液激活”减少。本研究比较了两种不同肝素涂层对不同血液激活指标的影响。

方法

将低风险患者(n = 40)随机分为三组,分别使用完全涂有Duraflo II肝素涂层或Carmeda生物活性表面的体外循环设备进行冠状动脉搭桥术,或使用相同的未涂层设备。在所有情况下,均使用标准的全身肝素剂量。在体外循环期间及术后6小时,对补体激活(C3激活产物C3bc和C3a以及液相终末SC5b-9补体复合物的形成)、中性粒细胞激活(乳铁蛋白和髓过氧化物酶)以及溶解抑制剂(玻连蛋白和簇集素)进行定量分析。

结果

与未涂层系统相比,两种方法的肝素涂层均减少了终末SC5b-9补体复合物的形成以及乳铁蛋白和髓过氧化物酶的释放。在Duraflo II组中,体外循环期间乳铁蛋白和髓过氧化物酶水平显著升高,而在Carmeda生物活性表面组中未观察到显著升高。使用Maxima Carmeda生物活性表面涂层设备时,终末SC5b-9补体复合物的形成和中性粒细胞激活最少。与对照组相比,Duraflo II组中玻连蛋白和簇集素浓度的降低幅度明显较小。本研究强调了终末SC5b-9补体复合物作为评估体外循环期间补体激活的合适标志物的重要性。

结论

两种肝素涂层均能减少血液激活,Carmeda生物活性表面可能比Duraflo II更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验