Hamel M E, Eynon E E, Savelkoul H F, van Oudenaren A, Kruisbeek A M
Division of Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
Int Immunol. 1995 Jul;7(7):1065-77. doi: 10.1093/intimm/7.7.1065.
To elucidate the parameters that lead to superantigen induced non-responsiveness, an in vitro model for studying primary and secondary responses to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) was established. Upon re-activation with SEB, in vitro SEB primed T cells show an early proliferative response that 'quenches' in time and is severely impaired 3 days after re-stimulation. Despite their overall impaired proliferative capacity and IL-2 production, these T cells are able to produce IFN-gamma and to up-regulate activation markers CD69 and IL-2R alpha upon re-stimulation with SEB, demonstrating that SEB non-responsiveness is not absolute. Rather, it reflects the inability to mount an ongoing proliferative response upon re-stimulation with SEB. Our results also demonstrate that SEB-induced non-responsiveness is not simply the result of presentation in the absence of co-stimulation, since presentation of SEB on highly purified dendritic cells during the primary response did not prevent the induction of non-responsiveness. As previously shown, SEB induces a Th1 phenotype in responding CD4+ T cells. Skewing towards a Th2 phenotype by adding IL-4 and antibodies to IFN-gamma did not prevent the induction of non-responsiveness by SEB. Interestingly, T cells pretreated with plate-bound anti-CD3 epsilon and anti-V beta 8 were also non-responsive to SEB re-stimulation. Thus, non-responsiveness to SEB (defined here as inability to produce IL-2 and proliferate) seems to reflect an intrinsic inability of previously activated T cells to respond to SEB, probably reflecting differences in signal transduction pathways used by naive versus previously activated T cells.
为了阐明导致超抗原诱导无反应性的参数,建立了一个体外模型,用于研究对细菌超抗原葡萄球菌肠毒素B(SEB)的初次和二次反应。在用SEB再次激活后,体外经SEB致敏的T细胞显示出早期增殖反应,该反应会随时间“熄灭”,并在再次刺激后3天严重受损。尽管这些T细胞的整体增殖能力和IL-2产生受损,但在用SEB再次刺激时,它们仍能够产生IFN-γ并上调激活标志物CD69和IL-2Rα,这表明对SEB的无反应性并非绝对的。相反,它反映了在用SEB再次刺激时无法产生持续的增殖反应。我们的结果还表明,SEB诱导的无反应性不仅仅是在缺乏共刺激的情况下呈递的结果,因为在初次反应期间在高度纯化的树突状细胞上呈递SEB并不能阻止无反应性的诱导。如先前所示,SEB在反应性CD4 + T细胞中诱导Th1表型。通过添加IL-4和抗IFN-γ抗体偏向Th2表型并不能阻止SEB诱导的无反应性。有趣的是,用板结合的抗CD3ε和抗Vβ8预处理的T细胞对SEB再次刺激也无反应。因此,对SEB的无反应性(在此定义为无法产生IL-2和增殖)似乎反映了先前激活的T细胞对SEB作出反应的内在无能,这可能反映了幼稚T细胞与先前激活的T细胞所使用的信号转导途径的差异。