Suppr超能文献

美罗培南对比妥布霉素加克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验的结果

Meropenem versus tobramycin plus clindamycin for treatment of intraabdominal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

作者信息

Condon R E, Walker A P, Sirinek K R, White P W, Fabian T C, Nichols R L, Wilson S E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Sep;21(3):544-50. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.3.544.

Abstract

The efficacy of meropenem was compared to that of the combination of tobramycin plus clindamycin (T/C) in a multiinstitutional clinical trial of treatment for patients suffering intraabdominal infection. Among the 177 patients enrolled and randomized, 127 were clinically evaluable and 86 were microbiologically evaluable. Analysis of data on an intent-to-treat basis for all randomized patients and on the basis of a successful outcome (absence of any infection) for clinically evaluable patients failed to detect any difference in efficacy between the two treatments. Infection was cleared in 92% of meropenem- and 89% of T/C-treated clinically evaluable patients. Eradication of pathogens also was similar in the two treatment groups. Overall, adverse drug experiences were comparable between the two treatment groups, with the exception of an increase in serum creatinine level (which occurred more frequently in patients receiving T/C). Meropenem appears to be efficacious for the treatment of intraabdominal infections.

摘要

在一项针对腹腔内感染患者治疗的多机构临床试验中,对美罗培南与妥布霉素加克林霉素联合用药(T/C)的疗效进行了比较。在177名登记并随机分组的患者中,127名可进行临床评估,86名可进行微生物学评估。对所有随机分组患者进行意向性治疗分析,以及对可进行临床评估的患者基于成功结局(无任何感染)进行分析,均未发现两种治疗方法在疗效上有任何差异。在可进行临床评估的患者中,接受美罗培南治疗的患者感染清除率为92%,接受T/C治疗的患者为89%。两个治疗组的病原体根除情况也相似。总体而言,两个治疗组的药物不良反应相当,但血清肌酐水平升高的情况除外(接受T/C治疗的患者中更常见)。美罗培南似乎对腹腔内感染的治疗有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验