Eyüboğlu B M, Oner A F, Baysal U, Biber C, Keyf A I, Yilmaz U, Erdoğan Y
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Physiol Meas. 1995 Aug;16(3 Suppl A):A191-211. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/16/3a/018.
In this paper, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) ventilation images from a group of 12 patients (11 patients with emphysema and one patient with only chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (chronic bronchitis) and a group of 15 normal subjects were acquired using a Sheffield mark 1 EIT system, at the levels of second, fourth and sixth intercostal spaces. Patients were diagnosed based on CT scans of the thorax, pulmonary function tests and posteroanterior x-ray graphs. One of the patients with emphysema has also a malignant lung tumour. Ventilation-related conductivity changes at total lung capacity (TLC) relative to residual volume were measured quantitatively in EIT images. These quantitative values demonstrate marked differences compared to those values obtained from the EIT images of 15 normal subjects. The EIT images of the patients were also compared with the CT images. In addition to the visual examination of the EIT images a statistical confidence test is applied to compare the images of the patients with the images of the normal subjects. Prior to statistical analysis all images are normalized with TLC to minimize the effect of mismatch between the TLC of different subjects. A normal mean image is created by averaging the normalized images from the normal subjects, at each intercostal space level. Than a 95% confidence interval is defined for each normal mean image. For each image of the patients, a confidence test image, which represents the deviations from the 95% confidence interval of the normal mean image, is created. The regions with emphysematous bulla and parencyhma are detectable in the confidence test images as regions of positive and negative deviations from the confidence interval of the normal mean, respectively. In the test images, it is possible to differentiate emphysematous parenchyma from emphysematous bulla, tumour structure, and COPD. However, the emphysematous bulla, the tumour structure, and COPD result in the same type of defect in the test images and are therefore indistinguishable from each other. In some case, off-plane contributions in the EIT images may result in underestimation of the defects. EIT may be a useful screening device in detecting emphysema rather than a diagnostic tool.
在本文中,使用谢菲尔德1型电阻抗断层成像(EIT)系统,在第二、第四和第六肋间水平获取了一组12名患者(11名肺气肿患者和1名仅患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)(慢性支气管炎)的患者)以及一组15名正常受试者的EIT通气图像。患者根据胸部CT扫描、肺功能测试和后前位X光片进行诊断。其中一名肺气肿患者还患有恶性肺肿瘤。在EIT图像中定量测量了相对于残气量的肺总量(TLC)时与通气相关的电导率变化。这些定量值与从15名正常受试者的EIT图像中获得的值相比有显著差异。还将患者的EIT图像与CT图像进行了比较。除了对EIT图像进行视觉检查外,还应用了统计置信度检验来比较患者的图像与正常受试者的图像。在进行统计分析之前,所有图像均以TLC进行归一化,以尽量减少不同受试者TLC之间不匹配的影响。通过对正常受试者在每个肋间水平的归一化图像求平均值来创建正常平均图像。然后为每个正常平均图像定义95%置信区间。对于患者的每幅图像,创建一个置信度测试图像,该图像表示与正常平均图像的95%置信区间的偏差。在置信度测试图像中,肺气肿大疱和肺实质区域分别作为与正常平均置信区间的正偏差和负偏差区域可被检测到。在测试图像中,可以区分肺气肿肺实质与肺气肿大疱、肿瘤结构和COPD。然而,肺气肿大疱、肿瘤结构和COPD在测试图像中导致相同类型的缺陷,因此彼此无法区分。在某些情况下,EIT图像中的平面外贡献可能导致对缺陷的低估。EIT可能是检测肺气肿的一种有用的筛查设备,而不是一种诊断工具。