• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自英国人口普查与调查办公室纵向研究中按住房保有形式和汽车拥有情况划分的死亡率差异。

Differences in mortality by housing tenure and by car access from the OPCS Longitudinal Study.

作者信息

Filakti H, Fox J

出版信息

Popul Trends. 1995 Autumn(81):27-30.

PMID:8528790
Abstract

Housing tenure and household access to a car are useful indicators of socio-economic status. They are simple to collect and process in censuses and surveys, and are effective discriminators of mortality. They can be used for all members of the population including children, women and the retired. These are groups where socio-economic differences in mortality based on occupation can be difficult to interpret. Using Longitudinal Study data, this article presents an analysis of differences in male and female mortality in England and Wales in the 1980s according to household tenure and car access. The findings are compared with those observed in the 1970s. Mortality levels are lower in the 1980s for all groups. The analyses suggest that differences across tenure and car access groups have increased in relative and absolute terms, particularly for those under 65.

摘要

住房保有 tenure 和家庭是否拥有汽车是社会经济地位的有用指标。它们在人口普查和调查中易于收集和处理,并且是死亡率的有效区分因素。它们可用于包括儿童、妇女和退休人员在内的所有人口群体。在这些群体中,基于职业的死亡率社会经济差异可能难以解释。本文利用纵向研究数据,对20世纪80年代英格兰和威尔士按家庭保有 tenure 和汽车拥有情况划分的男性和女性死亡率差异进行了分析。研究结果与20世纪70年代观察到的结果进行了比较。20世纪80年代所有群体的死亡率水平都较低。分析表明,保有 tenure 和汽车拥有情况不同的群体之间的差异在相对和绝对方面都有所增加,特别是对于65岁以下的人群。

相似文献

1
Differences in mortality by housing tenure and by car access from the OPCS Longitudinal Study.来自英国人口普查与调查办公室纵向研究中按住房保有形式和汽车拥有情况划分的死亡率差异。
Popul Trends. 1995 Autumn(81):27-30.
2
Housing wealth and mortality: A register linkage study of the Finnish population.住房财富与死亡率:芬兰人口的登记关联研究
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Sep;69(5):754-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.035. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
3
Is there a 'Scottish effect' for mortality? Prospective observational study of census linkage studies.是否存在“苏格兰效应”对死亡率的影响?人口普查链接研究的前瞻性观察研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Sep;33(3):453-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr023. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
4
Social class differences in mortality of men: recent evidence from the OPCS Longitudinal Study. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys.男性死亡率的社会阶层差异:来自人口普查与调查办公室纵向研究的最新证据。人口普查与调查办公室。
Popul Trends. 1995 Summer(80):31-7.
5
Longitudinal study of socio-economic differences in the incidence of stomach, colorectal and pancreatic cancers.胃癌、结直肠癌和胰腺癌发病率社会经济差异的纵向研究。
Popul Trends. 1998 Winter(94):35-41.
6
House value as an indicator of cumulative wealth is strongly related to morbidity and mortality risk in older people: a census-based cross-sectional and longitudinal study.房价作为累积财富的指标与老年人的发病和死亡风险密切相关:基于人口普查的横断面和纵向研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):383-91. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp356. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
7
Economic activity and mortality of the 1981 Census cohort in the OPCS Longitudinal Study.英国人口普查局纵向研究中1981年人口普查队列的经济活动与死亡率
Popul Trends. 1996 Spring(83):37-42.
8
Does car ownership reflect socio-economic disadvantage in rural areas? A cross-sectional geographical study in Wales, UK.汽车拥有情况是否反映了农村地区的社会经济劣势?英国威尔士的一项横断面地理研究。
Public Health. 2003 Mar;117(2):112-6. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(02)00027-6.
9
The association of cancer survival with four socioeconomic indicators: a longitudinal study of the older population of England and Wales 1981-2000.癌症生存率与四项社会经济指标的关联:对1981 - 2000年英格兰和威尔士老年人口的纵向研究
BMC Cancer. 2007 Jan 25;7:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-20.
10
Are housing tenure and car access still associated with health? A repeat cross-sectional study of UK adults over a 13-year period.住房保有形式和汽车使用情况是否仍与健康相关?一项对英国成年人进行的为期13年的重复横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 2;6(11):e012268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012268.

引用本文的文献

1
Living in public rental housing is healthier than private rental housing a 9-year cohort study from Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study.居住在公共租赁住房比私人租赁住房更健康:来自日本老年评估研究的 9 年队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):7547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58244-y.
2
Housing and Inequalities in US Life Expectancy, Child and Youth Mortality, and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality, 1979-2020: Results from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study and the National Vital Statistics System.1979 - 2020年美国预期寿命、儿童和青少年死亡率以及全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率中的住房与不平等现象:来自全国纵向死亡率研究和国家 Vital Statistics 系统的结果
Int J MCH AIDS. 2023;12(2):e653. doi: 10.21106/ijma.653. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Housing tenure and disability in the UK: trends and projections 2004-2030.
英国的住房保有率与残疾状况:2004-2030 年的趋势和预测。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 4;11:1248909. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1248909. eCollection 2023.
4
Inequalities in mortality associated with housing conditions in Belgium between 1991 and 2020.1991 年至 2020 年期间比利时住房条件与死亡率之间的不平等现象。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):2397. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14819-w.
5
The Influence of Living Conditions on Self-Rated Health: Evidence from China.居住条件对自评健康的影响:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 31;18(17):9200. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179200.
6
Marked Disparities in Life Expectancy by Education, Poverty Level, Occupation, and Housing Tenure in the United States, 1997-2014.1997 - 2014年美国在受教育程度、贫困水平、职业和住房保有形式方面预期寿命的显著差异
Int J MCH AIDS. 2021;10(1):7-18. doi: 10.21106/ijma.402. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
Genes, Race, and Causation: US Public Perspectives About Racial Difference.基因、种族与因果关系:美国公众对种族差异的看法
Race Soc Probl. 2018 Jun;10(2):79-90. doi: 10.1007/s12552-018-9223-7. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Independent Associations Between Different Measures of Socioeconomic Position and Smoking Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of Adults in England.不同社会经济地位衡量指标与吸烟状况之间的独立关联:对英格兰成年人的横断面研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa030.
9
Physical Attributes of Housing and Elderly Health: A New Dynamic Perspective.住房的物理属性与老年人健康:一个新的动态视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 6;16(24):4961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244961.
10
Inequalities in mental health and well-being in a time of austerity: Baseline findings from the Stockton-on-Tees cohort study.财政紧缩时期的心理健康与幸福不平等:蒂斯河畔斯托克顿队列研究的基线结果
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Apr 30;2:350-359. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.04.006. eCollection 2016 Dec.