Suppr超能文献

基于顺铂所致呕吐强度比较托烷司琼与胃复安合剂的疗效

Comparison of the efficacy of tropisetron versus a metoclopramide cocktail based on the intensity of cisplatin-induced emesis.

作者信息

Chang T C, Hsieh F, Lai C H, Tseng C J, Cheng H H, Li C L, Michael B J, Soong Y K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1996;37(3):279-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00688329.

Abstract

Cisplatin-induced emesis is one of the most feared side effects in cancer treatment. High-dose metoclopramide may prevent only 30-40% of cases of acute emesis. Investigations to test the efficacy of new antiemetics are mandatory. We compared the efficacy, toxicity, and patients' preference for tropisetron, a new 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (HT3) receptor antagonist, with those of a combination of high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and lorazepam (metoclopramide cocktail) in a randomized crossover study for the control of nausea and vomiting during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. A total of 62 chemotherapy-naive women were included and followed over 3 consecutive courses. Detailed analysis comparing the incidence of acute emesis for each 4 h period following cisplatin infusion was also performed. Complete protection from acute emesis was obtained in 48% of patients receiving tropisetron and 29% of patients receiving the metoclopramide cocktail over the first two courses of chemotherapy (P = 0.029). When the frequency of acute emesis in all patients was compared on a daily basis, no significant difference was found. When emesis frequency was compared over each 4 h period following infusion of cisplatin, tropisetron was superior to the metoclopramide cocktail during the first, the second, and the first and second periods (P = 0.0001, P = 0.01 and P = 0.0006, respectively). This superiority reversed after 12 h but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.112). Tropisetron was more effective in controlling acute nausea, but metoclopramide provided better control of delayed emesis. A drop in efficacy over successive courses was observed in patients receiving metoclopramide first but was not seen in tropisetron-first patients. A tendency for tropisetron preference was observed. Tropisetron is more effective than the metoclopramide cocktail in the control of chemotherapy-induced vomiting within 8 h of the implementation of cisplatin and in the control of nausea on the 1st day. To improve the control of chemotherapy-induced emesis, further investigations on the additional tropisetron dosing at 8 h after cisplatin infusion or the combination use of tropisetron and other antiemetics by a continuous 4 h period of observation and comparison are mandatory.

摘要

顺铂所致呕吐是癌症治疗中最令人恐惧的副作用之一。大剂量甲氧氯普胺仅能预防30% - 40%的急性呕吐病例。测试新型止吐药疗效的研究势在必行。在一项随机交叉研究中,我们比较了新型5 - 羟色胺3(HT3)受体拮抗剂托烷司琼与大剂量甲氧氯普胺、地塞米松、苯海拉明和劳拉西泮联合用药(甲氧氯普胺合剂)在含顺铂化疗期间控制恶心和呕吐的疗效、毒性及患者偏好。共纳入62例未接受过化疗的女性患者,并对其连续3个疗程进行随访。还对顺铂输注后每4小时期间急性呕吐的发生率进行了详细分析。在化疗的前两个疗程中,48%接受托烷司琼治疗的患者和29%接受甲氧氯普胺合剂治疗的患者完全预防了急性呕吐(P = 0.029)。当每日比较所有患者的急性呕吐频率时,未发现显著差异。当比较顺铂输注后每4小时期间的呕吐频率时,托烷司琼在第一个、第二个以及第一和第二个时间段均优于甲氧氯普胺合剂(分别为P = 0.0001、P = 0.01和P = 0.0006)。这种优势在12小时后逆转,但未达到统计学显著性(P = 0.112)。托烷司琼在控制急性恶心方面更有效,但甲氧氯普胺在控制延迟性呕吐方面效果更好。在首先接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者中观察到连续疗程疗效下降,但在首先接受托烷司琼治疗的患者中未观察到。观察到患者有倾向于选择托烷司琼的趋势。在顺铂给药后8小时内,托烷司琼在控制化疗所致呕吐方面比甲氧氯普胺合剂更有效,且在第1天控制恶心方面效果更佳。为改善化疗所致呕吐的控制,必须对顺铂输注后8小时追加托烷司琼剂量或托烷司琼与其他止吐药联合连续4小时观察比较进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验