Tsuang D, Cowley D, Ries R, Dunner D L, Roy-Byrne P P
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;56(12):549-55.
The comorbidity of substance abuse or dependence and psychiatric illness can complicate the diagnosis, clinical course, and treatment of dually diagnosed patients. In this study, we examined the relationship between substance use disorder (SUD) and psychopathology in an outpatient psychiatric setting.
Among 391 patients evaluated at an anxiety and effective disorders clinic, 54 patients met DSM-III-R criteria for lifetime substance use disorder and current unipolar depression or anxiety disorder. We selected 54 sex- and age-matched controls with psychiatric illness without SUD as a comparison group. All patients were given a structured diagnostic interview and symptom rating scales. In addition to comparing dual and single diagnosis groups, we compared those within the dual diagnosis group and those with primary psychiatric disorder with those with primary SUD; we also compared those with current versus past SUD.
In contrast to findings in other settings, there were no significant differences in the severity of psychopathology between patients with and without substance abuse/dependence. Within dually diagnosed patients, those with primary mental disorder were more anxious and depressed than those with primary SUD. Patients with primary mental disorder had a significantly higher number of psychiatric diagnoses, an earlier onset of any psychiatric disorder, and were more likely to have received treatment. Conversely, patients with primary SUD had a higher number of substance use disorder diagnoses and an earlier onset of SUD.
Dually diagnosed patients had the same degree of psychopathology as patients with only psychiatric disorders in this outpatient psychiatric population. The primary/secondary classification may be useful to distinguish between subgroups of dual diagnosis patients. Future studies are necessary to determine if this distinction can be useful to predict course and outcome in dually diagnosed patients.
物质滥用或依赖与精神疾病的共病会使双重诊断患者的诊断、临床病程及治疗变得复杂。在本研究中,我们在门诊精神科环境中研究了物质使用障碍(SUD)与精神病理学之间的关系。
在一家焦虑及情感障碍诊所接受评估的391例患者中,54例符合DSM-III-R终生物质使用障碍及当前单相抑郁或焦虑障碍标准。我们选择54例年龄和性别匹配、患有精神疾病但无SUD的对照者作为比较组。所有患者均接受结构化诊断访谈及症状评定量表评估。除比较双重诊断组和单一诊断组外,我们还比较了双重诊断组内以及原发性精神障碍患者与原发性SUD患者;我们还比较了当前有SUD与既往有SUD的患者。
与其他环境中的研究结果相反,有或无物质滥用/依赖的患者在精神病理学严重程度上无显著差异。在双重诊断患者中,原发性精神障碍患者比原发性SUD患者更焦虑和抑郁。原发性精神障碍患者的精神科诊断数量显著更多,任何精神障碍的起病更早,且更有可能接受过治疗。相反,原发性SUD患者的物质使用障碍诊断数量更多,SUD起病更早。
在该门诊精神科人群中,双重诊断患者的精神病理学程度与仅患有精神疾病的患者相同。原发性/继发性分类可能有助于区分双重诊断患者的亚组。未来有必要开展研究以确定这种区分是否有助于预测双重诊断患者的病程及结局。