Ozata M, Bayhan H, Bingöl N, Dündar S, Beyhan Z, Corakci A, Gundogan M A
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Gulhane School of Medicine, Etlik-Ankara, Turkey.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995 Dec;80(12):3634-8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.12.8530612.
To determine the detectability and the time course of serum thyroid peroxidase (TPO) levels before and 1, 2, 4, and 6 months after 131I administration, we evaluated TPO in 13 selected patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) whose sera did not contain antimicrosomal or antithyroglobulin (Tg) antibodies. All patients received 131I therapy 6 or 8 weeks after thyroid surgery for ablation of the postsurgical thyroid remnant. Serum samples were also collected from 10 normal subjects. Measurement of TPO was carried out by using a new commercially available immunoluminometric assay with a sensitivity of 30 pg/mL. Serum Tg was measured by RIA with a sensitivity of 2.6 micrograms/L before and 6 months after 131I administration. In all patients, a standard total body scan was obtained before and 6 months after 131I administration. TPO was undetectable in all sera from normal subjects. However, serum TPO became detectable in all patients with DTC during the study, whereas rescans were either negative or positive and appeared not to be related to the radioiodine dose given, histology of the thyroid tumor, residual thyroid volume, TSH levels, or age of patients. However, a significant negative correlation was present between TPO levels before 131I administration and the time from surgery (r = -0.82, P < 0.001). Six of 13 patients had increased TPO levels 1 month after 131I administration. Serum TPO levels tended to decrease during follow-up in most patients (7 of 10) with a negative rescan. In 3 patients with positive rescans, TPO levels tended to increase during follow-up. Patients with negative rescans had values of serum TPO overlapping the range of values seen in patients with positive rescans, thus demonstrating the inability of TPO assay as a useful marker for following patients with DTC. We found no correlation between Tg and TPO levels measured before and 6 months after 131I administration, thereby excluding TPO levels as a marker for thyroid cancer. Our results suggest that TPO, unlike Tg, does not appear to be a useful marker for following patients with DTC.
为了确定血清甲状腺过氧化物酶(TPO)水平在131I给药前以及给药后1、2、4和6个月的可检测性及变化过程,我们评估了13例选定的分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者的TPO水平,这些患者的血清中不含抗微粒体或抗甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)抗体。所有患者在甲状腺手术后6或8周接受131I治疗,以消融术后甲状腺残余组织。还从10名正常受试者中采集了血清样本。采用一种新的市售免疫发光分析法测定TPO,其灵敏度为30 pg/mL。在131I给药前及给药后6个月,采用放射免疫分析法测定血清Tg,灵敏度为2.6微克/升。所有患者在131I给药前及给药后6个月均进行了标准的全身扫描。正常受试者的所有血清中均未检测到TPO。然而,在研究期间,所有DTC患者的血清TPO均可检测到,而再次扫描结果为阴性或阳性,且似乎与给予的放射性碘剂量、甲状腺肿瘤组织学、残余甲状腺体积、TSH水平或患者年龄无关。然而,131I给药前的TPO水平与手术时间之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.82,P < 0.001)。13例患者中有6例在131I给药后1个月TPO水平升高。在大多数再次扫描为阴性的患者(10例中的7例)随访期间,血清TPO水平趋于下降。在3例再次扫描为阳性的患者中,TPO水平在随访期间趋于升高。再次扫描为阴性的患者的血清TPO值与再次扫描为阳性的患者的数值范围重叠,因此表明TPO检测不能作为DTC患者随访的有用标志物。我们发现131I给药前及给药后6个月测得的Tg和TPO水平之间无相关性,从而排除TPO水平作为甲状腺癌标志物的可能性。我们的结果表明,与Tg不同,TPO似乎不是DTC患者随访的有用标志物。