• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

类别独特性和刺激关系对幼儿检索聚类策略运用的影响。

The effects of category distinctiveness and stimulus relations on young children's use of retrieval clustering strategies.

作者信息

Nida R E, Lange G

机构信息

Department of Child Development and Family Relations, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 1995 Oct;122(4):345-53. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1995.9921246.

DOI:10.1080/00221309.1995.9921246
PMID:8530916
Abstract

The influence of category distinctiveness and the associative relatedness of within-category items on young children's use of an organizational clustering strategy at retrieval was examined. Children from preschool and Grades 1 and 3 studied and recalled 9-item sets of pictured items representing either distinctive categories (e.g., numbers, letters, animals) or standard categories (e.g., furniture, clothing, animals). Half of the children at each grade level and in each category-type condition received category exemplars that were high associates. The results showed that each of the grade levels exhibited above-chance clustering for the distinctive categories but not for the standard categories. However, preschool participants attained above-chance clustering only for high-associate items, suggesting that their retrieval may have been driven automatically by natural word associations inherent in the stimuli. For older participants, above-chance clustering obtained for the low-associate as well as for the high-associate items, suggesting that they may have engaged in strategic retrieval activity.

摘要

研究了类别独特性和类别内项目的关联度对幼儿在检索时使用组织聚类策略的影响。来自学前班、一年级和三年级的儿童学习并回忆了9个项目的图片集,这些图片集代表了独特类别(如数字、字母、动物)或标准类别(如家具、服装、动物)。每个年级水平和每种类别类型条件下的一半儿童收到的类别范例是高度相关的。结果表明,每个年级水平在独特类别上都表现出高于随机水平的聚类,但在标准类别上则没有。然而,学前班参与者仅在高度相关项目上达到了高于随机水平的聚类,这表明他们的检索可能是由刺激中固有的自然单词关联自动驱动的。对于年龄较大的参与者,在低相关项目和高相关项目上都获得了高于随机水平的聚类,这表明他们可能参与了策略性检索活动。

相似文献

1
The effects of category distinctiveness and stimulus relations on young children's use of retrieval clustering strategies.类别独特性和刺激关系对幼儿检索聚类策略运用的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1995 Oct;122(4):345-53. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1995.9921246.
2
Children's metamemory about the influence of conceptual relations on recall.儿童关于概念关系对回忆影响的元记忆。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Jun;62(1):1-29. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0020.
3
Form characteristics of category-retrieval relationships in children and adults.儿童和成人中类别检索关系的形式特征。
J Gen Psychol. 1990 Jan;117(1):5-14. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1990.9917768.
4
Developmental and individual differences in young children's use and maintenance of a selective memory strategy.幼儿使用和维持选择性记忆策略的发展及个体差异。
Dev Psychol. 2009 Jul;45(4):1034-50. doi: 10.1037/a0015597.
5
The effects of theories on children's acquisition of family-resemblance categories.理论对儿童获得家族相似性类别的影响。
Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):333-46.
6
Developmentally invariant dissociations in children's true and false memories: not all relatedness is created equal.儿童真实记忆与错误记忆中发展不变的分离现象:并非所有关联性都是等同的。
Child Dev. 2006 Jul-Aug;77(4):1112-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00922.x.
7
Effects of list organization and retrieval cues on children's delayed recall.
J Genet Psychol. 1992 Dec;153(4):421-33. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1992.10753737.
8
Are lions and tigers substitutes or associates? Evidence against slot filler accounts of children's early categorization.狮子和老虎是替代品还是关联物?反对儿童早期分类的插槽填充解释的证据。
Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):347-54.
9
Cross-classification and category representation in children's concepts.儿童概念中的交叉分类和类别表征
Dev Psychol. 2007 May;43(3):719-31. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.719.
10
Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.学习规则描述和非规则描述的类别:儿童与成人的比较。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1518-33. doi: 10.1037/a0013355.