Shi X, Stevens G H, Foresman B H, Stern S A, Raven P B
Department of Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth 76107, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Oct;27(10):1406-13.
The purpose of this study was to assess hemodynamic responses to lower body negative pressure (LBNP) to -45 torr with selective cardiac parasympathetic (using atropine sulphate), sympathetic efferent (using metoprolol tartrate), and combined (atropine+metoprolol) blockade prior to and following 8 months of endurance exercise training in eight young men. Training resulted in significant increases of maximal oxygen uptake (27%) and blood volume (16%) and a decrease of baseline heart rate (HR, from 66 +/- 4 to 57 +/- 4 bpm). This training related bradycardia was exclusively determined by an enhanced vagal tone as there was no significant difference in intrinsic HR pre- to post-training and only atropine (pre: 100 +/- 3 vs post: 101 +/- 3 bpm), not metoprolol (pre: 56 +/- 3 vs post: 49 +/- 4 bpm), abolished the HR difference. The reflex tachycardia in the control experiment was significantly diminished following training. However, the increase in HR at LBNP -45 torr between pre- and post-training was similar after either atropine (+13 +/- 2 vs +14 +/- 1 bpm) or metoprolol (+8 +/- 1 vs +8 +/- 1 bpm). Reflex tachycardia was greater during atropine than metoprolol blockade and the sum of the HR increase during selective blockade (21 and 22 bpm) was greater when compared with the control (no blockade, 16 +/- 2 vs 11 +/- 2 bpm). There was no difference pre- to post-training in SV or Qc response to -45 torr LBNP during the control condition. However, selective beta 1-receptor blockade resulted in a greater decrease in SV to -45 torr LBNP post-training compared to pre-training (P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在评估8名年轻男性在进行8个月耐力运动训练前后,选择性心脏副交感神经阻滞(使用硫酸阿托品)、交感神经传出阻滞(使用酒石酸美托洛尔)以及联合阻滞(阿托品+美托洛尔)对-45托下体负压(LBNP)的血流动力学反应。训练导致最大摄氧量显著增加(27%)和血容量增加(16%),同时静息心率降低(HR,从66±4次/分钟降至57±4次/分钟)。这种与训练相关的心动过缓完全由迷走神经张力增强所致,因为训练前后固有心率无显著差异,且只有阿托品(训练前:100±3次/分钟,训练后:101±3次/分钟)而非美托洛尔(训练前:56±3次/分钟,训练后:49±4次/分钟)能消除心率差异。在对照实验中,训练后反射性心动过速显著减弱。然而,训练前后LBNP -45托时的心率增加在使用阿托品(+13±2次/分钟对+14±1次/分钟)或美托洛尔(+8±1次/分钟对+8±1次/分钟)时相似。反射性心动过速在阿托品阻滞期间大于美托洛尔阻滞期间,与对照(无阻滞,16±2次/分钟对11±2次/分钟)相比,选择性阻滞期间心率增加之和(21和22次/分钟)更大。在对照条件下,训练前后对-45托LBNP的每搏输出量(SV)或心输出量(Qc)反应无差异。然而,选择性β1受体阻滞导致训练后与训练前相比,-45托LBNP时的SV下降更大(P<0.05)。(摘要截断于250字)