Heinonen S, Ryynänen M, Kirkinen P, Saarikoski S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Kuopio, Finland.
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;87(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00339-8.
To evaluate the association between velamentous cord insertion and adverse pregnancy outcome in singleton pregnancies, and to assess the diagnostic usefulness of nonstress testing (NST) and Doppler ultrasound in this condition.
We retrospectively reviewed 12,750 consecutive singleton, chromosomally normal pregnancies from July 1989 through December 1993 at the University Hospital of Kuopio, Finland. Of these, 216 were complicated by velamentous umbilical cord insertion, whereas the remaining 12,534 were normal controls. Using multiple regression analysis, we evaluated the risks by noting adverse infant outcomes: low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), preterm delivery, fetal death, admission to a specific infant care unit, low Apgar scores, neonatal acidemia, and abnormal intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns. At prenatal visits, NST and Doppler ultrasound examinations were carried out as a routine part of obstetric care.
Even after we controlled for confounding factors, velamentous umbilical cord insertion was associated with higher risk of LBW (odds ratio [OR] 2.32), SGA (OR 1.54), preterm delivery (OR 2.12), low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes (ORs 1.76 and 2.47, respectively), and abnormal intrapartum FHR pattern (OR 1.59). Only 5% of the patients with abnormal insertion showed pathologic NST results at prenatal visits. Ultrasonographic examination was carried out on 80 patients with velamentous umbilical cord insertion as a routine part of obstetric care, and in only one case was direct visualization of the abnormal insertion successful. After we excluded pregnancies with preeclampsia, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry was found in none of the cases examined (n = 48).
There were substantial differences in pregnancy outcome measures between the subjects with velamentous umbilical cord insertion and controls. Current antepartum methods of tracing uteroplacental problems are not effective in the prenatal detection of abnormal insertion. Therefore, in future studies, the use of other diagnostic tools, such as color Doppler imaging of cord insertion, should be evaluated in high-risk pregnancies followed-up because of fetal growth restriction.
评估单胎妊娠中帆状脐带附着与不良妊娠结局之间的关联,并评估无应激试验(NST)和多普勒超声在这种情况下的诊断价值。
我们回顾性分析了1989年7月至1993年12月在芬兰库奥皮奥大学医院连续收治的12750例染色体正常的单胎妊娠。其中,216例合并帆状脐带附着,其余12534例为正常对照。我们采用多元回归分析,通过记录不良婴儿结局来评估风险:低出生体重(LBW)、小于胎龄儿(SGA)、早产、胎儿死亡、入住特定婴儿护理病房、阿氏评分低、新生儿酸血症以及产时胎儿心率(FHR)异常。在产前检查时,NST和多普勒超声检查作为产科护理的常规部分进行。
即使在我们控制了混杂因素之后,帆状脐带附着仍与LBW(优势比[OR]2.32)、SGA(OR 1.54)、早产(OR 2.12)、1分钟和5分钟时阿氏评分低(OR分别为1.76和2.47)以及产时FHR异常(OR 1.59)的较高风险相关。只有5%的附着异常患者在产前检查时NST结果异常。80例帆状脐带附着患者作为产科护理的常规部分进行了超声检查,只有1例成功直接观察到异常附着。在我们排除了子痫前期妊娠后,在所检查的病例(n = 48)中均未发现脐动脉多普勒测速异常。
帆状脐带附着的受试者与对照组在妊娠结局指标上存在显著差异。目前产前追踪子宫胎盘问题的方法在产前检测异常附着方面无效。因此,在未来的研究中,对于因胎儿生长受限而进行随访的高危妊娠,应评估使用其他诊断工具,如脐带附着的彩色多普勒成像。