• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[A comparative study of the efficacy of lisinopril versus quinapril in controlling light to moderate arterial hypertension. A follow-up with ABPM].

作者信息

Motero Carrasco J

机构信息

Centro Periférico de Especialidades Virgen de la Cinta, Huelva.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):746-53.

PMID:8532944
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril versus quinapril given 20 mg once daily for the treatment of mild to moderate arterial hypertension (I-II WHO grades) using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. This study also investigated the tolerance, adverse effects and changes in haematological or biochemical parameters with both drugs.

METHODS

Fifty patients (men and women) with a range of age between 18 to 75 years were included in this open, randomized study to assess the hypotensive efficacy of lisinopril versus quinapril after 2 months of treatment, using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). To study data obtained from ABPM Mc Call curves were used and statistical analysis was made using Epistat programme. Covariance and Chi-square test were used for the comparative analysis of different variables, considering as statistically significant the value p < 0.05. Graphics were made using Lotus 123, V 3.0 version. All patients gave their informed consent to participate in the study. The protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Clínico Hospital.

RESULTS

Systolic blood pressure decreased from 172.6 to 152.6 mmHg in the lisinopril group (p < 0.001) and from 171.6 to 147 mmHg in the quinapril group (p < 0.001). Diastolic blood pressure decreased from 105.6 to 86.8 mmHg in the lisinopril group (p < 0.001) and from 106.1 to 88.1 mmHg in the quinapril group (p < 0.05). Using ABPM mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 157.3 to 126.5 mmHg with lisinopril (p < 0.001) and from 148 to 137.4 mmHg with quinapril (p < 0.05). Mean diastolic blood pressure decreased from 93.6 to 81.7 mmHg with lisinopril (p < 0.001) and from 89.4 to 85.9 with quinapril (p < 0.05). Decreases in basal glycemia were found from 0.996 to 0.878 in quinapril group (p < 0.05), total quinapril cholesterol in both groups (from 228.7 to 207.2 with lisinopril and from 247.4 to 225.7 with quinapril) (p < 0.05) and cholesterol-LDL in the quinapril group (180.1 to 152.1) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both drugs produce a fall of blood pressure in mild-to-moderate hypertension, although using ABPM this fall is more significant with Lisinopril. According to Mc Call index 73.4% of patients in the lisinopril group and 62.7% of quinapril group controlled their hypertension, and a difference found between BP values obtained in the clinic and those obtained using ABPM.

摘要

相似文献

1
[A comparative study of the efficacy of lisinopril versus quinapril in controlling light to moderate arterial hypertension. A follow-up with ABPM].
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):746-53.
2
[Ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure in the treatment of mild-moderate arterial hypertension with lisinopril vs. enalapril].赖诺普利与依那普利治疗轻中度动脉高血压时的动态血压监测
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1997 Jan-Feb;67(1):29-37.
3
[A comparative study of the effects of lisinopril and quinapril administered once a day in essential hypertension].
Minerva Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;81(7-8):541-6.
4
[Quinapril versus lisinopril in the treatment of essential hypertension in elderly patients with low blood renin].喹那普利与赖诺普利治疗老年低肾素原发性高血压的比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1996 Dec;44(12):631-5.
5
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can play an integral role in patient selection, dosage adjustment and efficacy assessment in clinical trials of antihypertensive agents.动态血压监测在抗高血压药物临床试验的患者选择、剂量调整和疗效评估中可发挥不可或缺的作用。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994;12(7):S33-8.
6
The response to the first dose of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in uncomplicated hypertension--a placebo controlled study utilising ambulatory blood pressure recording.单纯性高血压患者对首剂血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的反应——一项采用动态血压记录的安慰剂对照研究
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991 Sep;32(3):393-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb03918.x.
7
Time-effect profile of antihypertensive agents assessed with trough/peak ratio, smoothness index and dose omission: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study with trandolapril vs. quinapril.采用谷峰比、平滑指数和撤药法评估降压药物的时间效应曲线:群多普利与喹那普利的动态血压监测研究
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;16(6):545-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.00131.x.
8
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol versus lisinopril in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension: a randomized, multicentre, double-blind study.奈必洛尔与赖诺普利治疗原发性高血压的疗效及耐受性评估:一项随机、多中心、双盲研究。
Blood Press Suppl. 2003 May;1:30-5. doi: 10.1080/08038020310000104.
9
Effect of losartan on nocturnal blood pressure in patients with stroke: comparison with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.
Am J Hypertens. 2002 Nov;15(11):998-1002. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(02)02998-9.
10
Effects of quinapril hydrochloride in patients with essential hypertension and impaired renal function.盐酸喹那普利对原发性高血压合并肾功能损害患者的疗效
Clin Exp Hypertens. 1997 May;19(4):495-502. doi: 10.3109/10641969709084510.

引用本文的文献

1
Quinapril: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.喹那普利:其在心血管疾病中的药理学及治疗应用的进一步更新
Drugs. 2002;62(2):339-85. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262020-00009.