• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喹那普利与赖诺普利治疗老年低肾素原发性高血压的比较

[Quinapril versus lisinopril in the treatment of essential hypertension in elderly patients with low blood renin].

作者信息

Rengo F, Canonico V

机构信息

Cattedra di Geriatria, Policlinici Pansini, Napoli.

出版信息

Minerva Cardioangiol. 1996 Dec;44(12):631-5.

PMID:9053816
Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of quinapril 20 mg once-a-day versus lisinopril 20 mg, in the treatment of old patients suffering from essential mild or moderate hypertension and presenting low levels of plasmarenin. It was a cross-over study with open treatments randomly assigned. Ten patients were treated, 6 females and 4 males, with average age of 67.1 years +/- 7.1. Two wash-out periods with placebo were scheduled, each lasting one week before the onset of active therapy; each treatment period lasted 21 days. Blood pressure controls (including the 24 hours monitoring) were done at basal time, after seven days and at the end of each treatment. Results show the efficacy and the safety of both the drugs and a more effective and constant control of hypertension by Quinapril was confirmed.

摘要

该研究的目的是评估每日一次服用20毫克喹那普利与20毫克赖诺普利在治疗患有原发性轻度或中度高血压且血浆肾素水平较低的老年患者中的疗效和耐受性。这是一项开放治疗随机分配的交叉研究。共治疗了10名患者,其中6名女性和4名男性,平均年龄为67.1岁±7.1岁。安排了两个为期一周的安慰剂洗脱期,分别在积极治疗开始前进行;每个治疗期持续21天。在基线期、七天后以及每个治疗结束时进行血压控制(包括24小时监测)。结果显示了两种药物的疗效和安全性,并证实喹那普利对高血压的控制更有效且持续。

相似文献

1
[Quinapril versus lisinopril in the treatment of essential hypertension in elderly patients with low blood renin].喹那普利与赖诺普利治疗老年低肾素原发性高血压的比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1996 Dec;44(12):631-5.
2
[A comparative study of the efficacy of lisinopril versus quinapril in controlling light to moderate arterial hypertension. A follow-up with ABPM].
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):746-53.
3
[A comparative study of the effects of lisinopril and quinapril administered once a day in essential hypertension].
Minerva Med. 1990 Jul-Aug;81(7-8):541-6.
4
Quinapril versus enalapril in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):651-5.
5
[A quinapril-hydrochlorothiazide combination in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension].
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1997 Jan-Feb;45(1-2):25-9.
6
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can play an integral role in patient selection, dosage adjustment and efficacy assessment in clinical trials of antihypertensive agents.动态血压监测在抗高血压药物临床试验的患者选择、剂量调整和疗效评估中可发挥不可或缺的作用。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994;12(7):S33-8.
7
Quinapril in the treatment of hypertension in primary care centers.
Clin Ther. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):1021-30.
8
[The Study Group of Quinapril in Arterial Hypertension. The Steering Committee].[喹那普利治疗动脉高血压研究组。指导委员会]
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1992 Mar;40(3):85-96.
9
Insulin-like growth factor-1 and cardiac mass in essential hypertension: comparative effects of captopril, lisinopril and quinapril.胰岛素样生长因子-1与原发性高血压患者心脏重量:卡托普利、赖诺普利和喹那普利的比较效应
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Jul;12(4):S31-6.
10
Effect of quinapril therapy on blood pressure and serotonin change in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1996 Nov;58(5):329-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial peptides with selective antitumor mechanisms: prospect for anticancer applications.具有选择性抗肿瘤机制的抗菌肽:抗癌应用前景
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 11;8(28):46635-46651. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16743.