Edlund M, Andersson K, Rybo G, Lindoff C, Astedt B, von Schoultz B
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;102(11):913-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb10881.x.
To compare the effect of Kabi 2161 (a prodrug of tranexamic acid) and placebo on the reduction of menstrual blood loss in women suffering from idiopathic menorrhagia and to evaluate tolerance and effectiveness in a two-dose regimen.
A randomised, double blind parallel group study using double dummy technique.
The departments of gynaecology at three medical centres in Sweden.
Ninety-one outpatients visiting the gynaecological clinics from March 1991 to May 1992 were randomised into the study; 68 women fulfilled the study.
Two run-in cycles, followed by administrations of Kabi 2161 (600 mg) tablets (1 four times daily or 2 twice daily) or placebo for the first five days of three menstrual cycles.
Objective measurement of the change in menstrual blood loss during the treatment periods compared with menstrual blood loss during the run-in periods.
A statistically significant reduction of menstrual blood loss was found for each treatment group, compared with the placebo group (P < 0.001). The mean reduction with 95% confidence interval (CI) was 33% (24-40) in the group treated with 1 four times daily and 41% (33-49) in the group treated 2 twice daily. The difference between the treated groups in reduction of menstrual blood loss is not significant. No significant differences were found in the frequencies of reported unwanted events during run-in and during treatment between the different treatment groups. There were also no significant differences between the treatment groups and the placebo group.
Kabi 2161 in a dosage of 2.4 g per day gave a statistically significant reduction in objectively measured menstrual blood loss in a two (41%) as well as in a four (33%) dosage regimen compared with placebo. Frequency of unwanted events did not differ from those during run-in or from those in the placebo group. The optimal daily dosage needs to be further evaluated in a dose titration study.
比较氨甲环酸前体药物卡比 2161 与安慰剂对特发性月经过多女性减少月经失血的效果,并评估两剂量方案的耐受性和有效性。
采用双盲双模拟技术的随机双盲平行组研究。
瑞典三个医疗中心的妇科科室。
1991 年 3 月至 1992 年 5 月到妇科门诊就诊的 91 名门诊患者被随机纳入研究;68 名女性完成了研究。
两个导入周期,随后在三个月经周期的前五天给予卡比 2161(600 毫克)片剂(每日 4 次,每次 1 片或每日 2 次,每次 2 片)或安慰剂。
与导入期相比,治疗期月经失血变化的客观测量。
与安慰剂组相比,各治疗组月经失血均有统计学显著减少(P < 0.001)。每日 4 次,每次 1 片治疗组的平均减少量及 95%置信区间(CI)为 33%(24 - 40),每日 2 次,每次 2 片治疗组为 41%(33 - 49)。治疗组之间月经失血减少量的差异不显著。不同治疗组在导入期和治疗期报告的不良事件频率无显著差异。治疗组与安慰剂组之间也无显著差异。
与安慰剂相比,卡比 2161 每日剂量 2.4 克在每日 2 次(41%)及每日 4 次(33%)剂量方案中,客观测量的月经失血有统计学显著减少。不良事件频率与导入期或安慰剂组无差异。最佳日剂量需要在剂量滴定研究中进一步评估。