Carrasco M, Evert D L, Chang I, Katz S M
Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Nov;57(8):1241-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03208380.
The serial pattern found for conjunction visual-search tasks has been attributed to covert attentional shifts, even though the possible contributions of target location have not been considered. To investigate the effect of target location on orientation x color conjunction searches, the target's duration and its position in the display were manipulated. The display was present either until observers responded (Experiment 1), for 104 msec (Experiment 2), or for 62 msec (Experiment 3). Target eccentricity critically affected performance: A pronounced eccentricity effect was very similar for all three experiments; as eccentricity increased, reaction times and errors increased gradually. Furthermore, the set-size effect became more pronounced as target eccentricity increased, and the extent of the eccentricity effect increased for larger set sizes. In addition, according to stepwise regressions, target eccentricity as well as its interaction with set size were good predictors of performance. We suggest that these findings could be explained by spatial-resolution and lateral-inhibition factors. The serial self-terminating hypothesis for orientation x color conjunction searches was evaluated and rejected. We compared the eccentricity effect as well as the extent of the orientation asymmetry in these three conjunction experiments with those found in feature experiments (Carrasco & Katz, 1992). The roles of eye movements, spatial resolution, and covert attention in the eccentricity effect, as well as their implications, are discussed.
尽管尚未考虑目标位置的可能影响,但在联合视觉搜索任务中发现的序列模式已被归因于隐蔽的注意力转移。为了研究目标位置对方向×颜色联合搜索的影响,对目标的持续时间及其在显示屏中的位置进行了操控。显示屏一直呈现到观察者做出反应(实验1),或者呈现104毫秒(实验2),或者呈现62毫秒(实验3)。目标离心率对表现有至关重要的影响:在所有三个实验中,明显的离心率效应非常相似;随着离心率增加,反应时间和错误逐渐增加。此外,随着目标离心率增加,集大小效应变得更加明显,并且对于更大的集大小,离心率效应的程度增加。另外,根据逐步回归分析,目标离心率及其与集大小的相互作用是表现的良好预测指标。我们认为这些发现可以用空间分辨率和侧向抑制因素来解释。对方向×颜色联合搜索的序列自终止假设进行了评估并被否定。我们将这三个联合实验中的离心率效应以及方向不对称程度与特征实验(卡拉斯科和卡茨,1992年)中的情况进行了比较。讨论了眼动、空间分辨率和隐蔽注意力在离心率效应中的作用及其影响。