• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[利兰案。法医学声明]

[the Liland case. The medical-legal declarations].

作者信息

Giertsen J C

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Oct 20;115(25):3152-3.

PMID:8539700
Abstract

On the basis of new medico-legal experts' opinions the Norwegian High Court decided in the Liland case that the original medico-legal experts had been mistaken. The prosecution wanted the High Court to hear the experts, but this request was rejected. The High Court's decision led to acquittal of Liland who had been convicted 24 years earlier of a double murder. With the support of seven British and two German forensic pathologists it is maintained that the original experts were right. This does not mean that a standpoint has been taken as to who could have committed the crime.

摘要

根据新的法医学专家意见,挪威高等法院在利兰案中判定,原来的法医学专家有误。检方希望高等法院听取专家意见,但这一请求被驳回。高等法院的裁决导致利兰被无罪释放,他在24年前被判犯有双重谋杀罪。在七名英国和两名德国法医病理学家的支持下,有人坚称原来的专家是正确的。但这并不意味着对谁可能实施了犯罪采取了某种立场。

相似文献

1
[the Liland case. The medical-legal declarations].[利兰案。法医学声明]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 Oct 20;115(25):3152-3.
2
[Estimation of incapacity to work in medico-legal opinions given by clinicians and forensic medicine specialists from the Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice--comparative analysis].[西里西亚医科大学法医学系临床医生和法医学专家出具的法医学意见中工作能力丧失的评估——比较分析]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2005 Oct-Dec;55(4):261-3.
3
[Medico-legal opinions in penal cases provided by clinicians and forensic medicine specialists--comparative analysis].[临床医生和法医学专家提供的刑事案件中的法医学意见——比较分析]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2005 Oct-Dec;55(4):257-60.
4
[Remarks about the position of the medico-legal expert in imperative regulations in the Penal and Civil Codes].[关于刑法典和民法典中强制性规定里法医学专家的地位的论述]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2005 Oct-Dec;55(4):268-72.
5
[Expert witness in cases of rape].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992 Jun 10;112(15):1967-70.
6
A study of amnesia in homicide cases and forensic psychiatric experts' examination of such claims.一项关于杀人案件中失忆症及法医精神病专家对此类声明的检查的研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2009 Sep-Oct;32(5):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
7
[Medico-legal autopsy--selected legal issues: the autopsy protocol].[法医学尸体解剖——选定的法律问题:尸体解剖协议]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2010 Jan-Mar;60(1):63-7.
8
[The role of the Medical Scientific Council's Forensic Committee in the consent judgments regarding private insurance companies].
Orv Hetil. 2008 Aug 3;149(31):1457-62. doi: 10.1556/OH.2008.28390.
9
[Medical expert opinion--credibility, ethics, remuneration].[医学专家意见——可信度、伦理、报酬]
Harefuah. 2007 Jul;146(7):534-6, 574, 473.
10
[Medico-legal opinions in cases for annulment of testament. Part I. Characteristics of investigative material. Characteristics of testators].[遗嘱撤销案件中的法医学意见。第一部分。调查材料的特征。遗嘱人的特征]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2007 Jan-Mar;57(1):34-41.