Suppr超能文献

会阴切开术的益处与风险:1980年以来英文文献综述。第二部分。

Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part II.

作者信息

Woolley R J

机构信息

Boynton Health Service, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1995 Nov;50(11):821-35. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199511000-00021.

Abstract

Mediolateral and, to a lesser degree, midline episiotomies substantially increase the amount of blood loss at delivery; in fact, simple avoidance of episiotomy may be the most powerful means the delivery attendant has to prevent excessive intrapartum hemorrhage. The long-term morbidity of the anal sphincter damage induced by episiotomy, particularly midline, has generally been underestimated in both its frequency and severity. Other potential fetal and maternal complications of episiotomies, although rare, are numerous and serious. The overall degree of risk that accompanies this procedure could only be justified by a clear and overriding benefit, which, as discussed under "Benefits" earlier in this review, does not appear to exist.

摘要

会阴侧切术(无论是中侧切还是程度稍轻的正中侧切)都会显著增加分娩时的失血量;事实上,单纯避免会阴侧切术可能是产科医护人员预防分娩期大出血最有效的方法。会阴侧切术,尤其是正中侧切术所导致的肛门括约肌损伤的长期发病率,在发生频率和严重程度上通常都被低估了。会阴侧切术的其他潜在母婴并发症虽然罕见,但种类繁多且严重。只有在有明确且极为重要的益处时,实施该手术带来的总体风险才是合理的,而正如本综述前文“益处”部分所讨论的,这种益处似乎并不存在。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验