• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

会阴切开术的益处与风险:对1860年至1980年英文文献的解释性综述

Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980.

作者信息

Thacker S B, Banta H D

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983 Jun;38(6):322-38.

PMID:6346168
Abstract

The benefits and risks of episiotomy in labor and delivery as recorded in the English language literature in over 350 books and articles published since 1860 are reviewed and analyzed. Episiotomy is performed in over 60 per cent of all deliveries in the United States and in a much higher per cent of primigravidas. Yet, there is no clearly defined evidence for its efficacy, particularly for routine use. In addition, although poorly studied, there is evidence that postpartum pain and discomfort are accentuated after episiotomy, and serious complications, including maternal death, can be associated with the procedure. Therefore, carefully designed controlled trials of benefit and risk should be carried out on the use of episiotomy.

摘要

回顾并分析了自1860年以来出版的350多本英文书籍和文章中所记录的分娩时会阴切开术的益处和风险。在美国,超过60%的分娩会进行会阴切开术,初产妇的比例更高。然而,目前尚无明确证据证明其有效性,尤其是常规使用时。此外,尽管相关研究较少,但有证据表明,会阴切开术后产后疼痛和不适会加剧,该手术还可能导致包括产妇死亡在内的严重并发症。因此,应对会阴切开术的使用开展精心设计的利弊对照试验。

相似文献

1
Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980.会阴切开术的益处与风险:对1860年至1980年英文文献的解释性综述
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983 Jun;38(6):322-38.
2
A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.一项关于手术阴道分娩时会阴切开术的使用与母婴发病率关系的前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1688-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x.
3
[Episiotomy--a review of the literature].[会阴切开术——文献综述]
Harefuah. 2002 Sep;141(9):833-8, 856.
4
A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.经阴道手术分娩时常规与限制性使用会阴切开术的随机对照试验:一项多中心试点研究。
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01960.x.
5
[Review of the literature on advantages and disadvantages: episiotomy: only limited protection against ruptures--time for a revision?].[关于利弊的文献综述:会阴切开术:仅对破裂有有限的保护作用——是否需要修订?]
Lakartidningen. 1998 Sep 30;95(40):4354-8.
6
Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery.阴道分娩时肛门括约肌撕裂的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242616.56617.ff.
7
Episiotomy: an evidence-based approach.会阴切开术:一种基于证据的方法。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006 Aug;61(8):491-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000228708.45543.6b.
8
Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: a nationwide follow-up.阴道、会阴、肛门括约肌和直肠撕裂伤与产后首次性交:一项全国性随访研究
Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):98-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00222.x.
9
[Complete and complicated tears of the perineum in spite of preventive incision. A study of the risk factors and the short-term consequences].[尽管采取了预防性切口,仍出现会阴完全性和复杂性撕裂。危险因素及短期后果的研究]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1993;22(4):419-23.
10
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):117-22. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00088.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Study of the relationship between mediolateral episiotomy in vaginal delivery and pelvic organ prolapse in pregnant mothers.阴道分娩中会阴侧切术与孕产妇盆腔器官脱垂关系的研究
Eur J Transl Myol. 2025 Jun 27;35(2). doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13822. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Primary Carcinomas of the Episiotomy Scar Site: A Systematic Literature Review.会阴切开术瘢痕部位原发性癌:一项系统文献综述
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jan 26;32(2):65. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32020065.
3
Trends and determinants of the use of episiotomy in a prospective population-based registry from central India.
印度中部前瞻性基于人群登记处中会阴切开术使用的趋势和决定因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06762-y.
4
Level of episiotomy practice and its disparity among primiparous and multiparous women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚初产妇和经产妇会阴切开术的实施水平及其差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Nov 6;4:1153640. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1153640. eCollection 2023.
5
Examining the Association Between Episiotomy and Severe Perineal Tears in a Tertiary Care Center Implementing a Restrictive Episiotomy Policy.在一家实施限制性会阴切开术政策的三级护理中心研究会阴切开术与严重会阴撕裂之间的关联。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 17;14(11):e31606. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31606. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders.国际尿控协会(ICS)/国际女性盆底功能障碍学会(IUGA)关于产科盆底功能障碍评估和管理术语的联合报告。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):1-42. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05397-x. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
7
Episiotomy Practice and Its Associated Factors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非洲地区会阴切开术的实施情况及其相关因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 24;9:905174. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.905174. eCollection 2022.
8
How I came to write papers for clinicians in the late 1980s about improving the quality of reviews.我是如何在20世纪80年代末开始为临床医生撰写关于提高综述质量的论文的。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Jul;115(7):273-275. doi: 10.1177/01410768221107459.
9
Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal births in Shanghai hospitals, China: a comparison of policies.中国上海医院选择性与常规性会阴切开术用于阴道分娩的比较:政策比较。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04790-0.
10
Effects of lateral episiotomy on the emergence of urinary incontinence during the first postpartum year in primiparas: prospective cohort study.初产妇产后第一年侧切对尿失禁发生的影响:前瞻性队列研究
Prz Menopauzalny. 2021 Dec;20(4):163-169. doi: 10.5114/pm.2021.110956. Epub 2021 Nov 23.