Alarcon R D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;18(3):449-65.
Psychiatric diagnosis is a clinical activity subjected to more clinical determinants than many others. Based on a unique human encounter, it resorts to a variety of informational sources and interpretive mechanisms that reflect strong cultural biases. Each diagnostic system has mirrored the period of history in which it became established. This article examines the effect of culture on the two best-known diagnostic and classificatory systems: the DSM-IV and the ICD-10 Section V. It is important to minimize the ethnocentrism of disease categories in psychiatry and to highlight sources of possible cultural biases in the diagnostic interview and the diagnostic process in general, including assessment of comorbidity levels of stress, multiaxial impairment, everyday functioning, and management recommendations. Research on these issues and on diagnostic and measurement instruments must be pursued without sacrificing mainstream conventions.
精神科诊断是一项临床活动,相较于许多其他临床活动,它受到更多临床因素的影响。基于独特的医患接触,它诉诸多种信息来源和解释机制,这些机制反映了强烈的文化偏见。每个诊断系统都反映了其确立时期的历史阶段。本文探讨文化对两个最著名的诊断和分类系统的影响:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)和《国际疾病分类》第十版第五章(ICD-10 Section V)。尽量减少精神病学中疾病类别的民族中心主义,并突出诊断访谈及一般诊断过程中可能存在文化偏见的来源,包括压力共病水平、多轴损害、日常功能及治疗建议评估,这一点很重要。对这些问题以及诊断和测量工具的研究必须在不牺牲主流惯例的情况下进行。