• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对前列腺癌根治术和根治性放疗后淋巴结阳性患者辅助使用磷酸雌莫司汀、环磷酰胺及单纯观察的评估。国家前列腺癌项目的研究人员。

Evaluation of adjuvant estramustine phosphate, cyclophosphamide, and observation only for node-positive patients following radical prostatectomy and definitive irradiation. Investigators of the National Prostate Cancer Project.

作者信息

Schmidt J D, Gibbons R P, Murphy G P, Bartolucci A

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla 92103-8897, USA.

出版信息

Prostate. 1996 Jan;28(1):51-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(199601)28:1<51::AID-PROS7>3.0.CO;2-R.

DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(199601)28:1<51::AID-PROS7>3.0.CO;2-R
PMID:8545281
Abstract

In 1978 the National Prostate Cancer Project launched two protocols evaluating adjuvant therapy following surgery (Protocol 900) or irradiation (Protocol 1,000) for clinically localized prostate cancer. All patients underwent staging pelvic lymphadenectomy. Following definitive treatment, patients were randomized to either cyclophosphamide 1 gram/m2-IV every 3 weeks for 2 years, estramustine phosphate 600 mg/m2-po daily for up to 2 years, or to observation only. Patient accession closed in 1985 and includes 184 to Protocol 900 (170 evaluable) and 253 to Protocol 1,000 (233 evaluable). Lymph node involvement was identified in 198 patients (49% of total), 29% in Protocol 900, 63% in Protocol 1,000. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with nodal involvement in Protocol 1,000 receiving estramustine phosphate adjuvant was longer (37.3 mo) compared to cyclophosphamide (30.9 mo) and to no treatment (20.9 mo). Median PFS for patients with limited nodal disease in Protocol 1,000 was longer (39.9 mo), regardless of adjuvant, compared to extensive nodal disease (20.7 mo). However for patients with extensive nodal involvement, those receiving adjuvant estramustine phosphate experienced a significantly longer median PFS (32.8 mo) compared to adjuvant cyclophosphamide (22.7 mo) and no adjuvant (12.9 mo). We conclude that adjuvant estramustine phosphate is of benefit in prostate cancer patients with extensive pelvic node involvement receiving irradiation as definitive treatment.

摘要

1978年,国家前列腺癌项目启动了两项方案,评估针对临床局限性前列腺癌手术(方案900)或放疗(方案1000)后的辅助治疗。所有患者均接受分期盆腔淋巴结清扫术。在确定性治疗后,患者被随机分为三组,分别接受每3周静脉注射1克/平方米环磷酰胺,持续2年;每天口服600毫克/平方米磷酸雌莫司汀,持续2年;或仅进行观察。患者入组于1985年结束,方案900纳入184例患者(170例可评估),方案1000纳入253例患者(233例可评估)。198例患者(占总数的49%)发现有淋巴结受累,方案900中为29%,方案1000中为63%。接受磷酸雌莫司汀辅助治疗的方案1000中淋巴结受累患者的无进展生存期(PFS)中位数(37.3个月)长于接受环磷酰胺治疗的患者(30.9个月)和未接受治疗的患者(20.9个月)。方案1000中淋巴结疾病局限的患者,无论是否接受辅助治疗,其PFS中位数(39.9个月)均长于淋巴结疾病广泛的患者(20.7个月)。然而,对于淋巴结广泛受累的患者,接受磷酸雌莫司汀辅助治疗的患者PFS中位数(32.8个月)显著长于接受环磷酰胺辅助治疗的患者(22.7个月)和未接受辅助治疗的患者(12.9个月)。我们得出结论,对于接受放疗作为确定性治疗且盆腔淋巴结广泛受累的前列腺癌患者,磷酸雌莫司汀辅助治疗有益。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of adjuvant estramustine phosphate, cyclophosphamide, and observation only for node-positive patients following radical prostatectomy and definitive irradiation. Investigators of the National Prostate Cancer Project.对前列腺癌根治术和根治性放疗后淋巴结阳性患者辅助使用磷酸雌莫司汀、环磷酰胺及单纯观察的评估。国家前列腺癌项目的研究人员。
Prostate. 1996 Jan;28(1):51-7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(199601)28:1<51::AID-PROS7>3.0.CO;2-R.
2
Adjuvant therapy for clinical localized prostate cancer treated with surgery or irradiation.手术或放疗治疗的临床局限性前列腺癌的辅助治疗。
Eur Urol. 1996;29(4):425-33. doi: 10.1159/000473791.
3
Adjuvant therapy for localized prostate cancer.
Cancer. 1993 Feb 1;71(3 Suppl):1005-13. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<1005::aid-cncr2820711418>3.0.co;2-i.
4
Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: the positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy.接受盆腔淋巴结清扫术和根治性前列腺切除术治疗的前列腺癌伴淋巴结转移患者的长期随访:辅助放疗的积极影响
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1003-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.046. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
5
Pilot trial of adjuvant paclitaxel plus estramustine in resected high-risk prostate cancer.辅助性紫杉醇联合雌莫司汀治疗高危前列腺癌切除术后的初步试验
Urology. 2008 May;71(5):942-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.117. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
6
Radical prostatectomy for clinical T4 prostate cancer.临床T4期前列腺癌的根治性前列腺切除术
Cancer. 2006 Jun 15;106(12):2603-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21926.
7
Cooperative clinical trials of the National Prostatic Cancer Project: Protocol 900.国家前列腺癌项目合作临床试验:方案900
Prostate. 1984;5(4):387-99. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990050404.
8
Long-term results of adjuvant hormonal therapy plus radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for patients with pT3N0 or pT3N1 prostate cancer.pT3N0或pT3N1期前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后辅助激素治疗加放疗的长期结果。
Int J Urol. 2004 Jun;11(6):397-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00819.x.
9
Disease progression and survival in patients with prostate carcinoma and positive lymph nodes after radical retropubic prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌伴淋巴结阳性患者的疾病进展和生存情况
BJU Int. 2006 May;97(5):985-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06129.x.
10
Role of early adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌根治术后早期辅助激素治疗的作用
J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2208-15.

引用本文的文献

1
The addition of chemotherapy in the definitive management of high risk prostate cancer.在高危前列腺癌的确定性治疗中添加化疗。
Urol Oncol. 2018 Nov;36(11):475-487. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
2
Breast cancer clinical and translational research: analogies and implications for prostate cancer.乳腺癌临床与转化研究:对前列腺癌的类比及启示
Rev Urol. 2007;9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S28-39.
3
Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer.局限性和局部晚期前列腺癌的新辅助和辅助激素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006019. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006019.pub2.
4
The current status of adjuvant hormonal therapy combined with radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer.辅助激素治疗联合放射治疗局部前列腺癌的现状
Ir J Med Sci. 1998 Jul-Sep;167(3):138-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02937924.