• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危机中的倾诉:癌症患者倾诉模式的性别差异

Confiding in crisis: gender differences in pattern of confiding among cancer patients.

作者信息

Harrison J, Maguire P, Pitceathly C

机构信息

Cancer Research Campaign Psychological Medicine Group, Christie Hospital, Manchester, England.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(9):1255-60. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00411-l.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(94)00411-l
PMID:8545678
Abstract

Social support has been identified as a key predictor of psychological morbidity following adverse life-events. However, the majority of the research has focused exclusively on women, despite evidence of significant gender difference in the utilisation and role of social support. To examine gender differences in patterns of confiding crisis, 520 subjects were interviewed within 8 weeks of a cancer diagnosis. Men were as likely as women to have confided their main concern in others (61% mainly or fully confided vs 67% of women, P = 0.308) but were much more likely to have used only one confidante (45% vs 25% of women, P < 0.001) while women made use of a wider circle of family, friends and partner and used more confidantes overall. The results confirm marked gender differences in the utilisation of social support at times of crisis and call into question the extent to which support research using exclusively female samples can be generalized.

摘要

社会支持已被确定为不良生活事件后心理发病的关键预测因素。然而,尽管有证据表明社会支持的利用和作用存在显著的性别差异,但大多数研究仅关注女性。为了研究倾诉危机模式中的性别差异,在癌症诊断后的8周内对520名受试者进行了访谈。男性向他人倾诉主要担忧的可能性与女性相同(61%主要或完全倾诉,而女性为67%,P = 0.308),但男性更有可能只使用一个倾诉对象(45%,而女性为25%,P < 0.001),而女性会利用更广泛的家人、朋友和伴侣圈子,总体上使用的倾诉对象更多。结果证实了危机时刻社会支持利用方面存在明显的性别差异,并质疑仅使用女性样本的支持性研究能够推广的程度。

相似文献

1
Confiding in crisis: gender differences in pattern of confiding among cancer patients.危机中的倾诉:癌症患者倾诉模式的性别差异
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(9):1255-60. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00411-l.
2
Patterns of confiding relationships among adolescent girls.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;32(2):333-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00311.x.
3
A relational perspective of women coping with cancer: a preliminary study.
Soc Work Health Care. 1997;25(1-2):89-106. doi: 10.1300/J010v25n01_10.
4
Which patients talk about stressful life events and social problems to the general practitioner?
Psychol Med. 1998 Nov;28(6):1289-99. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798007478.
5
Crisis intervention: a drop-in support group for cancer patients and their families.
Soc Work Health Care. 1984 Winter;10(2):81-92. doi: 10.1300/j010v10n02_07.
6
Association of identity and intimacy: an exploration of gender and sex-role orientation.同一性与亲密关系的关联:对性别与性别角色取向的探究
Psychol Rep. 1996 Dec;79(3 Pt 2):1255-64. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3f.1255.
7
Social networks among users of mental health day care--predictors of social contacts and confiding relationships.心理健康日间护理使用者之间的社交网络——社交联系和倾诉关系的预测因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;40(6):467-74. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0909-y.
8
Confidants' feedback and traumatic life events.
J Trauma Stress. 1995 Jan;8(1):161-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02105414.
9
Victims' perceptions of social support: what is helpful from whom?受害者对社会支持的认知:谁提供的何种支持有用?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jan;58(1):80-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.1.80.
10
Disclosing a cancer diagnosis to friends and family: a gendered analysis of young men's and women's experiences.向朋友和家人透露癌症诊断结果:对年轻男性和女性经历的性别分析。
Qual Health Res. 2009 Jun;19(6):744-54. doi: 10.1177/1049732309334737. Epub 2009 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of emotional distress in patients with lymphoma, gastrointestinal, and breast cancer at the Kuwait Cancer Control Centre.科威特癌症控制中心淋巴瘤、胃肠道癌和乳腺癌患者情绪困扰的预测因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 26;33(9):809. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09853-4.
2
Health-Related Internet Use Among Outpatients Undergoing Cancer Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间接受癌症治疗的门诊患者的健康相关互联网使用情况:横断面调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 14;12:e72614. doi: 10.2196/72614.
3
Social support, social constraint, and psychological adjustment in patients with colorectal cancer.
结直肠癌患者的社会支持、社会约束与心理调适
J Behav Med. 2025 Jun;48(3):414-429. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00565-y. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
4
Determining factors of presentation and diagnosis delays in patients with colorectal cancer and the impact on stage: a cross sectional study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.印度尼西亚日惹地区结直肠癌患者就诊及诊断延迟的决定因素及其对分期的影响:一项横断面研究
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Sep 11;18:1761. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1761. eCollection 2024.
5
Validation of the Standardized Needs Evaluation Questionnaire in Polish Cancer Patients.波兰癌症患者标准化需求评估问卷的验证
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 9;16(8):1451. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081451.
6
Adult-Child Caregivers' Family Communication Experiences after an Older Parent's Blood Cancer Diagnosis: A Survey Exploring Their Openness, Avoidance, and Social Support.老年父母被诊断患有血癌后成年子女照顾者的家庭沟通经历:一项探索其开放性、回避行为和社会支持的调查
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;15(12):3177. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123177.
7
Comparing the effect of individual and group cognitive-motor training on reconstructing subjective well-being and quality of life in older males, recovered from the COVID-19.比较个体和团体认知-运动训练对重建 COVID-19 后康复的老年男性主观幸福感和生活质量的影响。
Cogn Process. 2023 Aug;24(3):361-374. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01136-2. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
8
Men and Women as Differential Social Barometers: Gender Effects of Perceived Friend Support on the Neuroticism-Loneliness-Well-Being Relationship in a Younger Adult Population.男性和女性作为不同的社会晴雨表:感知到的朋友支持对年轻成年人神经质-孤独-幸福感关系的性别影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;19(13):7986. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137986.
9
Couple Communication in Cancer: Protocol for a Multi-Method Examination.癌症中的夫妻沟通:多方法检查方案
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 7;12:769407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769407. eCollection 2021.
10
Radiation therapist-led telephone follow-up: identifying patients who require post-treatment care.放疗师主导的电话随访:识别需要治疗后护理的患者。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2021 Dec;68(4):389-395. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.521. Epub 2021 Jun 16.