Goto S, Kita T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chiba University School of Medicine, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Oct 15;20(20):2247-56. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199510001-00012.
We compared anterior and posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy resulting from ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Surgical techniques, based on shape and distribution of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, were divided into four technical phases.
Long-term follow-up data on anterior and posterior surgery were analyzed to establish guidelines for surgical treatment.
Comparison of anterior and posterior surgery is difficult because surgical techniques, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament shape classifications, and surgical criteria varied. No reports have accurately assessed spinal changes over a 10-year follow-up period.
Fifty patients received anterior surgery and 65 received posterior surgery between 1968 and 1993. Assessment after surgery was based on the recovery rate using the scoring system of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Spinal changes in the anterior group were assessed radiographically.
Recovery and final results improved with phase after anterior, but not posterior, surgery. Neurologic deterioration after initial recovery was lower for the anterior group. One third of patients in the anterior group followed for more than 7 years exhibited neurologic deterioration, with most showing these changes within 10 years. Worsening was attributed to insufficient removal of lateral, superior, or inferior ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, reossification at the excision site, kyphotic malalignment, growth of ossification at upper cervical levels, or untreated complicated hypertrophy of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Many patients showed a good outcome after surgery. Accurate alignment and long-range fusion improved results. If the cord was compressed in a canal narrowed to under 3 mm, anterior surgery was considered "too risky."
Complete extirpation of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament as confirmed by ultrasonography during surgery and long-range fusion with fibular grafts is advocated in the management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
我们比较了针对后纵韧带骨化所致颈椎脊髓病的前路手术和后路手术。基于后纵韧带骨化的形状和分布,手术技术被分为四个技术阶段。
分析前路手术和后路手术的长期随访数据,以制定手术治疗指南。
前路手术和后路手术的比较存在困难,因为手术技术、后纵韧带骨化的形状分类以及手术标准各不相同。尚无报告在10年随访期内准确评估脊柱变化。
1968年至1993年间,50例患者接受了前路手术,65例患者接受了后路手术。术后评估基于日本骨科协会评分系统的恢复率。对前路手术组的脊柱变化进行了影像学评估。
前路手术后恢复情况和最终结果随阶段改善,但后路手术并非如此。前路手术组初始恢复后神经功能恶化的情况较少。前路手术组中随访超过7年的患者中有三分之一出现神经功能恶化,大多数在10年内出现这些变化。病情恶化归因于后纵韧带外侧、上方或下方骨化切除不充分、切除部位再骨化、后凸畸形、上颈椎水平骨化生长或未治疗的后纵韧带复杂肥厚。许多患者术后效果良好。精确的对线和长期融合改善了结果。如果脊髓在狭窄至3毫米以下的椎管内受压,前路手术被认为“风险太大”。
在处理后纵韧带骨化时,提倡在手术中通过超声确认后纵韧带骨化的完全切除,并使用腓骨移植进行长期融合。