Barie P S, Hydo L J, Fischer E
Department of Surgery, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Arch Surg. 1996 Jan;131(1):37-43. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430130039007.
To determine whether scoring on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III at admission can predict the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and mortality in critically ill surgical patients.
Prospective, inception-cohort study.
Surgical intensive care unit of an urban, tertiary-care hospital.
One hundred fourteen critically ill patients with surgically treated perforated gastrointestinal viscus.
Calculation of APACHE II and APACHE III scores 24 hours after admission to the surgical intensive care unit and serial quantitation of organ dysfunction for the duration of critical care according to two different predefined scoring systems. Patients were stratified by survival, the development of organ dysfunction, and colon vs noncolonic perforation.
Hospital mortality, length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit, and the development of organ dysfunction or overt organ failure.
The mean (+/- SEM) APACHE II and APACHE III scores were 17.4 +/- 0.6 (range, 6 to 37) and 59.0 +/- 2.2 (range, 15 to 141), respectively. The incidence of organ dysfunction was 73% (64% in survivors). All severity scores were identical for colon perforation and noncolonic perforation subgroups. Nonsurvivors invariably had organ dysfunction. Overall length of stay in the intensive care unit was 12.0 +/- 1.6 days (8.7 +/- 1.2 days for survivors and 22.7 +/- 5.0 days for nonsurvivors). The APACHE scores and organ dysfunction or failure scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors, and APACHE scores were higher in survivors with organ dysfunction than in those without it. Significant linear relationships were identified for APACHE II vs APACHE III scores (R2 = .66) and for all four combinations of APACHE scores and organ dysfunction or failure scores (R2 = .43 to .52). By multivariate analysis of variance, independent predictors of organ dysfunction or failure were APACHE III, increased age, and a prolonged stay in the surgical intensive care unit, but not the type of perforation. Neither APACHE II or APACHE III predicted mortality independently.
The development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome correlated with higher APACHE III scores but was independent of the type of perforation. Only the development of overt multiple organ failure predicted death. Combined use of APACHE III and the multiple organ dysfunction score provides improved prediction of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, but further enhancements are needed before prediction of outcome in individual patients is reliable.
确定入院时急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)III评分能否预测重症外科患者多器官功能障碍综合征的发生及死亡率。
前瞻性起始队列研究。
一所城市三级医院的外科重症监护病房。
114例接受手术治疗的胃肠道穿孔重症患者。
入住外科重症监护病房24小时后计算APACHE II和APACHE III评分,并根据两种不同的预定义评分系统在重症监护期间对器官功能障碍进行连续定量评估。患者按生存情况、器官功能障碍的发生情况以及结肠穿孔与非结肠穿孔进行分层。
医院死亡率、在外科重症监护病房的住院时间以及器官功能障碍或明显器官衰竭的发生情况。
APACHE II和APACHE III评分的均值(±标准误)分别为17.4±0.6(范围6至37)和59.0±2.2(范围15至141)。器官功能障碍的发生率为73%(幸存者中为64%)。结肠穿孔和非结肠穿孔亚组的所有严重程度评分相同。非幸存者均存在器官功能障碍。重症监护病房的总体住院时间为12.0±1.6天(幸存者为8.7±1.2天,非幸存者为22.7±5.0天)。非幸存者的APACHE评分以及器官功能障碍或衰竭评分显著更高,且存在器官功能障碍的幸存者的APACHE评分高于无器官功能障碍者。APACHE II与APACHE III评分之间(R2 = 0.66)以及APACHE评分与器官功能障碍或衰竭评分的所有四种组合之间(R2 = 0.43至0.52)均存在显著的线性关系。通过多变量方差分析,器官功能障碍或衰竭的独立预测因素为APACHE III、年龄增加以及在外科重症监护病房的住院时间延长,而非穿孔类型。APACHE II或APACHE III均不能独立预测死亡率。
多器官功能障碍综合征的发生与较高的APACHE III评分相关,但与穿孔类型无关。只有明显的多器官衰竭的发生可预测死亡。联合使用APACHE III和多器官功能障碍评分可改善对多器官功能障碍综合征的预测,但在个体患者结局预测可靠之前还需要进一步改进。