• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性外阴切除术后会阴缺损的修复:直接缝合与皮瓣重建。一项回顾性比较研究。

Repair of the perineal defect after radical vulvar surgery: direct closure versus skin flaps reconstruction. A retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Landoni F, Proserpio M, Maneo A, Cormio G, Zanetta G, Milani R

机构信息

III. Clinica Osterica e Ginecologica-Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Aug;35(3):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01987.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01987.x
PMID:8546649
Abstract

From 1987 to 1990, 72 consecutive patients with primary untreated vulvar cancer underwent radical vulvar surgery with skin flaps reconstruction of the perineal defect. Postoperative complications, anatomical and functional results of this group of patients were compared with those of an historical control group of 77 patients submitted, at the same institution, to radical vulvectomy without reconstructive procedure from 1982 through 1986. The time of operation was significantly longer (180 minutes +/- 15 versus 120 minutes +/- 20) (p = 0.05) for patients submitted to the reconstructive procedure, while there was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the 2 groups. In comparison with direct closure, reconstructive procedures resulted in a significant lower rate of wound dehiscences (26% versus 64%) (p = 0.0001), vaginal introitus stenosis (2 versus 8) (p = 0.0001), sexual dysfunction (10% versus 50%) (p = 0.0001) and misdirection of the urinary stream (1 versus 5) (p = 0.001). It was concluded that skin flaps reconstruction is simple, reduces postoperative morbidity, and provides better anatomical and functional results than direct closure of the perineal defect.

摘要

1987年至1990年,72例未经治疗的原发性外阴癌患者连续接受了根治性外阴手术,并采用皮瓣重建会阴缺损。将该组患者的术后并发症、解剖和功能结果与1982年至1986年在同一机构接受根治性外阴切除术且未进行重建手术的77例患者的历史对照组进行比较。接受重建手术的患者手术时间明显更长(180分钟±15分钟对120分钟±20分钟)(p = 0.05),而两组间术中失血量和住院时间无统计学显著差异。与直接缝合相比,重建手术导致伤口裂开率显著降低(26%对64%)(p = 0.0001)、阴道入口狭窄发生率降低(2例对8例)(p = 0.0001)、性功能障碍发生率降低(10%对50%)(p = 0.0001)以及尿流方向异常发生率降低(1例对5例)(p = 0.001)。得出的结论是,皮瓣重建操作简单,可降低术后发病率,并且比直接缝合会阴缺损能提供更好的解剖和功能结果。

相似文献

1
Repair of the perineal defect after radical vulvar surgery: direct closure versus skin flaps reconstruction. A retrospective comparative study.根治性外阴切除术后会阴缺损的修复:直接缝合与皮瓣重建。一项回顾性比较研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Aug;35(3):300-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01987.x.
2
The inferior gluteal flap in the difficult vulvar and perineal reconstruction.臀下皮瓣在复杂外阴及会阴重建中的应用
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Sep;66(3):429-34. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4790.
3
V--Y flap for perineal reconstruction following modified approach to vulvectomy in vulvar cancer.V-Y皮瓣用于外阴癌改良外阴切除术后的会阴重建。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 May;65(2):157-63. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00016-8.
4
The rhomboid transposition flap for repair of the perineal defect after radical vulvar surgery.菱形转移皮瓣用于根治性外阴手术后会阴缺损的修复。
Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Aug;50(2):164-7. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1186.
5
Modified gluteal fold advancement V-Y flap for vulvar reconstruction after surgery for vulvar malignancies.改良臀沟推进 V-Y 皮瓣在外阴恶性肿瘤术后外阴重建中的应用。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jan;132(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.037. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
6
[Vulvoperineal reconstruction after extended radical vulvectomy: two reconstructive procedures].
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008 Mar;36(3):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.01.003.
7
Lotus petal flaps in vulvo-vaginal reconstruction.
Br J Plast Surg. 1996 Dec;49(8):547-54. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(96)90132-0.
8
Modified Gluteal Fold V-Y Advancement Flap for Reconstruction After Radical Vulvectomy.改良臀褶V-Y推进皮瓣用于根治性外阴切除术后的重建
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Sep;26(7):1300-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000765.
9
Reconstruction of defect after radical vulvectomy by the use of four-flap local transfer--a case report.
Acta Chir Plast. 2009;51(2):41-4.
10
Omentopexy for reconstruction of the perineum following a radical vulvectomy: a case report.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004 Nov-Dec;14(6):1122-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1048-891X.2004.14611.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Secondary post-oncologic vulvar reconstruction - a simplified algorithm.肿瘤后外阴重建二期——一种简化算法
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;13:1195580. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1195580. eCollection 2023.
2
Reconstructive Surgery versus Primary Closure following Vulvar Cancer Excision: A Wide Single-Center Experience.外阴癌切除术后重建手术与一期缝合:单中心广泛经验
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 26;14(7):1695. doi: 10.3390/cancers14071695.
3
Vulvar cancer: epidemiology, clinical presentation, and management options.外阴癌:流行病学、临床表现及治疗选择
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Mar 20;7:305-13. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S68979. eCollection 2015.
4
Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy.针对妇科恶性肿瘤治疗后女性性功能障碍的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD004708. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004708.pub2.