Risk assessment, a community perspective.
作者信息
Feldman J
机构信息
National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides, Washington, DC 20003, USA.
出版信息
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):153-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6153.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Risk assessment, a community perspective.风险评估：社区视角
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep;103 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):153-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6153.
2
When enough data are not enough to enact policy: The failure to ban chlorpyrifos.当数据不足时无法制定政策：氯吡硫磷未能被禁用。
PLoS Biol. 2017 Dec 21;15(12):e2003671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003671. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Cancer prevention through a precautionary approach to environmental chemicals.通过对环境化学物质采取预防措施预防癌症。
Rev Environ Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;24(4):271-7. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2009.24.4.271.
4
The hormesis challenge for environmental health regulators.环境健康监管者面临的 hormesis 挑战。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2001 Aug;20(8):435-8. doi: 10.1191/096032701682693008.
5
Hormesis and the law.毒物兴奋效应与法律
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2001 Mar;20(3):154-5. doi: 10.1191/096032701668304078.
6
Inhalation health risk to golfers from turfgrass pesticides at three northeastern U.S. sites.
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 1;41(3):1038-43. doi: 10.1021/es060964b.
7
Protecting children from pesticides and other toxic chemicals.保护儿童免受农药和其他有毒化学物质的伤害。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):119-20. doi: 10.1038/jes.2011.1. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
8
Environment. Endosulfan's exit: U.S. EPA pesticide review leads to a ban.环境。硫丹的退出：美国环境保护局的农药审查导致禁令。
Science. 2010 Jun 18;328(5985):1466. doi: 10.1126/science.328.5985.1466.
9
Interactions between environmental health and pediatric obesity.环境卫生与儿童肥胖之间的相互作用。
Explore (NY). 2008 Sep-Oct;4(5):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2008.07.004.
10
Tight deadlines and data gaps fan fight on pesticide safety.紧迫的期限和数据空白加剧了关于农药安全性的争论。
Nature. 1998 Nov 19;396(6708):207. doi: 10.1038/24242.
本文引用的文献
1
Family pesticide use and childhood brain cancer.家庭农药使用与儿童脑癌
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1993 Jan;24(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/BF01061094.
2
Response of experimental animals to human carcinogens: an analysis based upon the IARC Monographs programme.
Carcinogenesis. 1986 Nov;7(11):1853-63. doi: 10.1093/carcin/7.11.1853.
3
Childhood leukemia and parents' occupational and home exposures.儿童白血病与父母的职业及家庭暴露因素
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987 Jul;79(1):39-46.
4
Corporate influence on threshold limit values.企业对阈限值的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 1988;13(5):531-59. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700130503.
5
One-hit models of carcinogenesis: conservative or not?致癌作用的单 hit 模型：是否保守？
Risk Anal. 1988 Dec;8(4):485-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01189.x.
6
Threshold limit values: historical perspectives and current practice.
J Occup Med. 1989 Nov;31(11):910-8. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198911000-00014.
7
Losing the war against cancer: who's to blame and what to do about it.
Int J Health Serv. 1990;20(1):53-71. doi: 10.2190/W318-FRD5-KVX8-9QJJ.
8
But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of Threshold Limit Values.但它们并非阈限值：对阈限值文件的批判性分析。
Am J Ind Med. 1990;17(6):727-53. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700170607.
9
Chemical carcinogens: how dangerous are low doses?化学致癌物：低剂量有多危险？
Science. 1978 Oct 6;202(4363):37-41. doi: 10.1126/science.694517.
Zotero 插件