Castleman B I, Ziem G E
Am J Ind Med. 1988;13(5):531-59. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700130503.
Investigations into the historical development of specific Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for many substances have revealed serious shortcomings in the process followed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Unpublished corporate communications were important in developing TLVs for 104 substances; for 15 of these, the TLV documentation was based solely on such information. Efforts to obtain written copies of this unpublished material were mostly unsuccessful. Case studies on the TLV Committee's handling of lead and seven carcinogens illustrate various aspects of corporate influence and interaction with the committee. Corporate representatives listed officially as "consultants" since 1970 were given primary responsibility for developing TLVs on proprietary chemicals of the companies that employed them (Dow, DuPont). It is concluded that an ongoing international effort is needed to develop scientifically based guidelines to replace the TLVs in a climate of openness and without manipulation by vested interests.
对许多物质的特定阈限值(TLVs)历史发展的调查揭示了美国政府工业卫生学家会议所遵循的过程存在严重缺陷。未公开的公司通信在为104种物质制定阈限值时起到了重要作用;其中15种物质的阈限值文件仅基于此类信息。获取这些未公开材料书面副本的努力大多未成功。关于阈限值委员会对铅和七种致癌物处理情况的案例研究说明了公司对委员会的影响以及与委员会互动的各个方面。自1970年以来被正式列为“顾问”的公司代表,主要负责为雇用他们的公司(陶氏化学公司、杜邦公司)的专有化学品制定阈限值。得出的结论是,需要持续开展国际努力,在开放的环境中,不受既得利益者操纵的情况下,制定基于科学的准则来取代阈限值。