Drugan J K, Khosravi-Far R, White M A, Der C J, Sung Y J, Hwang Y W, Campbell S L
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1996 Jan 5;271(1):233-7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.1.233.
Although Raf-1 is a critical Ras effector target, how Ras mediates Raf-1 activation remains unresolved. Raf-1 residues 55-131 define a Ras-binding domain essential for Raf-1 activation. Therefore, our identification of a second Ras-binding site in the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain (residues 139-184) was unexpected and suggested a more complex role for Ras in Raf-1 activation. Both Ras recognition domains preferentially associate with Ras-GTP. Therefore, mutations that impair Ras activity by perturbing regions that distinguish Ras-GDP from Ras-GTP (switch I and II) may disrupt interactions with either Raf-1-binding domain. We observed that mutations of Ras that impaired Ras transformation by perturbing its switch I (T35A and E37G) or switch II (G60A and Y64W) domain preferentially diminished binding to Raf-1-(55-131) or the Raf-1 cysteine-rich domain, respectively. Thus, these Ras-binding domains recognize distinct Ras-GTP determinants, and both may be essential for Ras transforming activity. Finally, since Ha-Ras T35A and E37G mutations prevent Ras interaction with full-length Raf-1, we suggest that Raf-Cys is a cryptic binding site that is unmasked upon Ras interaction with Raf-1-(55-131).
尽管Raf-1是关键的Ras效应靶点,但Ras如何介导Raf-1激活仍未解决。Raf-1的55-131位残基定义了一个对Raf-1激活至关重要的Ras结合域。因此,我们在Raf-1富含半胱氨酸的结构域(139-184位残基)中鉴定出第二个Ras结合位点是出乎意料的,这表明Ras在Raf-1激活中发挥着更复杂的作用。两个Ras识别结构域都优先与Ras-GTP结合。因此,通过干扰区分Ras-GDP与Ras-GTP的区域(开关I和II)来损害Ras活性的突变可能会破坏与任一Raf-1结合域的相互作用。我们观察到,通过干扰其开关I(T35A和E37G)或开关II(G60A和Y64W)结构域来损害Ras转化的Ras突变,分别优先减少了与Raf-1-(55-131)或Raf-1富含半胱氨酸结构域的结合。因此,这些Ras结合结构域识别不同的Ras-GTP决定因素,两者可能对Ras转化活性都至关重要。最后,由于Ha-Ras T35A和E37G突变阻止了Ras与全长Raf-1的相互作用,我们认为Raf-Cys是一个隐蔽的结合位点,在Ras与Raf-1-(55-131)相互作用时会暴露出来。