Kleter G E, van Doorn L J, Stuyver L, Maertens G, Brouwer J T, Schalm S W, Heijtink R A, Quint W G
Department of Virology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Med Virol. 1995 Sep;47(1):35-42. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890470108.
Two rapid genotyping methods for hepatitis C virus (HCV), the line probe assay (Inno-LiPA) and the subtype-specific core amplification system [Okamoto et al., (1992b) Journal of General Virology 73:673-679], were applied to 58 HCV isolates which were typed as type 1 (n = 37) and type 2 (n = 21) by sequence analysis of the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR). The line probe assay targets the 5'UTR and recognized 12 subtype 1a, 25 subtype 1b, 18 subtype 2a, 2 subtype 2b and 1 subtype 2d in accordance with sequence analysis of this region. Subtype-specific core amplification revealed 7 discrepancies among the 37 type 1 isolates when compared to LiPA. A different subtype was observed in 3 isolates (1a versus 1b), 2 isolates remained untyped and 2 isolates showed a coinfection of subtype 1a and 1b. The first 5 discrepancies were confirmed by sequence analysis of the core region whereas the coinfection could not be confirmed. Of the 21 type 2 isolates only one could be typed by subtype-specific core amplification. HCV RNA was detected in all 21 cases after the general first round of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Direct sequencing of the core region indicated sequence variation as a source of failure. It is concluded that LiPA results are conclusive for typing of HCV. However, LiPA is hampered occasionally for subtyping by lack of subtype-specific sequence variation in 5'UTR. Subtyping results by subtype-specific core amplification were accurate. However, it seems that this assay is not suitable for the identification of genotype 2 isolates that circulate in patients living in Western Europe.
两种丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)快速基因分型方法,即线性探针分析(Inno-LiPA)和亚型特异性核心扩增系统[冈本等人,(1992b)《普通病毒学杂志》73:673 - 679],被应用于58株HCV分离株,这些分离株通过对5'非翻译区(5'UTR)的序列分析被分型为1型(n = 37)和2型(n = 21)。线性探针分析以5'UTR为靶点,根据该区域的序列分析,识别出12株1a亚型、25株1b亚型、18株2a亚型、2株2b亚型和1株2d亚型。与线性探针分析相比,亚型特异性核心扩增在37株1型分离株中显示出7处差异。在3株分离株中观察到不同的亚型(1a与1b),2株分离株仍未分型,2株分离株显示1a和1b亚型的混合感染。前5处差异通过核心区域的序列分析得到证实,而混合感染无法得到证实。在21株2型分离株中,只有1株可通过亚型特异性核心扩增进行分型。在第一轮常规聚合酶链反应(PCR)后,所有21例病例中均检测到HCV RNA。核心区域的直接测序表明序列变异是分型失败的原因。结论是,线性探针分析结果对于HCV分型具有决定性意义。然而,线性探针分析偶尔会因5'UTR中缺乏亚型特异性序列变异而在亚型分型方面受到阻碍。亚型特异性核心扩增的亚型分型结果准确。然而,似乎该检测方法不适用于鉴定在西欧患者中流行的2型分离株。