• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包皮环切术对学龄前男孩尿路感染发生率的影响。

Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys.

作者信息

Craig J C, Knight J F, Sureshkumar P, Mantz E, Roy L P

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70423-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70423-7
PMID:8551417
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether circumcision decreases the risk of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in boys less than 5 years of age.

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study (1993 to 1995) in the setting of a large ambulatory pediatric service. Case subjects and control subjects were drawn from the same population. One hundred forty-four boys less than 5 years of age (median age, 5.8 months) who had a microbiologically proven symptomatic UTI (case subjects), were compared with 742 boys (median age, 21.0 months) who did not have a UTI (control subjects). The proportion of case and control subjects who were circumcised in each group was compared with the use of the chi-square test, with the strength of association between circumcision and UTI expressed in terms of an odds ratio. To determine whether age was a confounder or an effect-modifier, we stratified the groups by age (< 1 year; > or = 1 year) and analyzed by the method of Mantel-Haenszel.

RESULTS

Of the 144 preschool boys with UTI, 2 (1.4%) were circumcised, compared with 47 (6.3%) of the 742 control subjects (chi-square value = 5.6; p = 0.02; odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence intervals, 0.06 to 0.76). There was no evidence that age was a confounder or modified the protective effect of circumcision on the development of UTI (Mantel-Haenszel chi-square value = 6.0; p = 0.01; combined odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence intervals, 0.05 to 0.71; Breslow-Day test of homogeneity chi-square value = 0.6; p = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Circumcision decreases the risk of symptomatic UTI in preschool boys. The protective effect is independent of age.

摘要

目的

确定包皮环切术是否能降低5岁以下男孩出现症状性尿路感染(UTI)的风险。

研究设计

一项于1993年至1995年在大型门诊儿科服务机构开展的病例对照研究。病例组和对照组来自同一人群。将144名5岁以下(中位年龄5.8个月)经微生物学证实患有症状性UTI的男孩(病例组)与742名未患UTI的男孩(对照组,中位年龄21.0个月)进行比较。使用卡方检验比较每组中接受包皮环切术的病例组和对照组的比例,包皮环切术与UTI之间的关联强度用比值比表示。为确定年龄是混杂因素还是效应修饰因素,我们按年龄(<1岁;≥1岁)对两组进行分层,并采用Mantel-Haenszel方法进行分析。

结果

在144名患UTI的学龄前男孩中,2名(1.4%)接受了包皮环切术,而在742名对照组男孩中,这一比例为47名(6.3%)(卡方值 = 5.6;p = 0.02;比值比,0.21;95%置信区间,0.06至0.76)。没有证据表明年龄是混杂因素或改变了包皮环切术对UTI发生的保护作用(Mantel-Haenszel卡方值 = 6.0;p = 0.01;合并比值比,0.18;95%置信区间,0.05至0.71;Breslow-Day齐性检验卡方值 = 0.6;p = 0.4)。

结论

包皮环切术可降低学龄前男孩出现症状性UTI的风险。这种保护作用与年龄无关。

相似文献

1
Effect of circumcision on incidence of urinary tract infection in preschool boys.包皮环切术对学龄前男孩尿路感染发生率的影响。
J Pediatr. 1996 Jan;128(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70423-7.
2
Cohort study on circumcision of newborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary-tract infection.新生儿男孩包皮环切术及后续尿路感染风险的队列研究。
Lancet. 1998 Dec 5;352(9143):1813-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02392-7.
3
Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies.包皮环切术预防男孩尿路感染:随机试验和观察性研究的系统评价
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Aug;90(8):853-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.049353. Epub 2005 May 12.
4
Circumcision for the prevention of significant bacteriuria in boys.包皮环切术预防男孩严重菌尿症
Pediatr Nephrol. 2001 Dec;16(12):1129-34. doi: 10.1007/s004670100044.
5
What is the effect of circumcision on risk of urinary tract infection in boys with posterior urethral valves?包皮环切术对患有后尿道瓣膜的男孩尿路感染风险有何影响?
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Feb;44(2):417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.102.
6
Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections during the first year of life.新生儿包皮环切术可降低出生后第一年尿路感染的发生率及治疗成本。
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):789-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.789.
7
Neonatal Circumcision and Urinary Tract Infections in Infants With Hydronephrosis.新生儿包茎与肾积水患儿尿路感染。
Pediatrics. 2018 Jul;142(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3703. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
The effect of circumcision on the frequency of urinary tract infection, growth and nutrition status in infants with antenatal hydronephrosis.包皮环切术对产前肾积水婴儿尿路感染、生长和营养状况频率的影响。
Ren Fail. 2013;35(10):1365-9. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.828263. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
9
Is ritual circumcision a risk factor for neonatal urinary tract infections?仪式性包皮环切术是新生儿尿路感染的危险因素吗?
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Mar;94(3):191-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.144063. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
10
What is the risk of urinary tract infection in children with antenatally presenting dilating vesico-ureteric reflux?产前出现扩张性膀胱输尿管反流的儿童发生尿路感染的风险是多少?
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):93.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
What paediatricians need to know about modern urologic management of vesicoureteral reflux.儿科医生需要了解的关于膀胱输尿管反流现代泌尿外科管理的知识。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jun 26;13:1607019. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1607019. eCollection 2025.
2
Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia.澳大利亚基于证据的包皮环切术政策。
J Mens Health. 2022;18(6). doi: 10.31083/j.jomh1806132. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).
加拿大泌尿外科学会关于加拿大婴儿正常包皮护理及新生儿包皮环切术的指南(完整版)。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Feb;12(2):E76-E99. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5033. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
4
Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (abridged version).加拿大泌尿外科学会关于加拿大婴儿正常包皮护理及新生儿包皮环切术的指南(简版)
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Feb;12(2):18-28. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5034. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Circumcision-related tragedies seen in children at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.在加纳库马西的Komfo Anokye教学医院观察到的儿童包皮环切术相关悲剧。
BMC Urol. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12894-016-0183-1.
6
What is the efficacy of circumcision in boys with complex urinary tract abnormalities?对于患有复杂尿路异常的男孩,割礼的疗效如何?
Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Dec;28(12):2267-72. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2410-2. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
7
Urinary tract infection: The debate continues..
Paediatr Child Health. 1998 Mar;3(2):139-40. doi: 10.1093/pch/3.2.139.
8
Adult male circumcision: effects on sexual function and sexual satisfaction in Kisumu, Kenya.成年男性包皮环切术:对肯尼亚基苏木地区性功能和性满意度的影响
J Sex Med. 2008 Nov;5(11):2610-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00979.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
Preputial bacterial colonisation in preschool and primary school children.学龄前和小学儿童的包皮细菌定植
Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(1):101-5. doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-4700-x.
10
Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies.包皮环切术预防男孩尿路感染:随机试验和观察性研究的系统评价
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Aug;90(8):853-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.049353. Epub 2005 May 12.