Suppr超能文献

兔形目(兔子、野兔及相关物种)的系统发育位置。

Phylogenetic position of the order Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares and allies).

作者信息

Graur D, Duret L, Gouy M

机构信息

Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Nature. 1996 Jan 25;379(6563):333-5. doi: 10.1038/379333a0.

Abstract

Ever since they have been classified as ruminants in the Old Testament (Leviticus 11:6, Deuteronomy 14:7) and equated with hyraxes in the vulgate Latin translation, rabbits and their relatives (order Lagomorpha) have frequently experienced radical changes in taxonomic rank. By using 91 orthologous protein sequences, we have attempted to answer the classical question "What, if anything, is a rabbit?". Here we show that Lagomorpha is significantly more closely related to Primates and Scandentia (tree shrews) than it is to rodents. This newly determined phylogenetic position invalidates the superordinal taxon Glires (Lagomorpha + Rodentia), and indicates that the morphological 'synapomorphies' previously used to cluster rodents and lagomorphs into Glires, may actually represent symplesiomorphies or homoplasies that are of no phylogenetic value. This raises the possibility that the ancestral eutherian morphotype may have possessed many rodent-like morphological characters.

摘要

自从兔子及其近亲(兔形目)在《旧约》中被归类为反刍动物(《利未记》11:6,《申命记》14:7),并在通俗拉丁文译本中被等同于蹄兔以来,它们在分类等级上经常经历根本性的变化。通过使用91个直系同源蛋白质序列,我们试图回答这个经典问题:“兔子到底是什么?”。在这里,我们表明兔形目与灵长目和树鼩目(树鼩)的亲缘关系明显比与啮齿动物的关系更近。这一新确定的系统发育位置使总目分类单元啮齿动物(兔形目+啮齿目)无效,并表明以前用于将啮齿动物和兔形目归为啮齿动物的形态“共衍征”,实际上可能代表没有系统发育价值的共祖征或同形特征。这就增加了一个可能性,即原始真兽类形态型可能具有许多类似啮齿动物的形态特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验