Miyamoto M M
Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-2009, USA.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996 Dec;6(3):373-90. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0087.
The four orders of eutherian mammals which are traditionally placed in the superorder Archonta [Chiroptera (microbats and megabats), Dermoptera (flying lemurs), Primates (primates), and Scandentia (tree shrews)] are among the best-studied taxa of their infraclass from both the molecular and morphological perspectives. Nevertheless, the ordinal relationships of archontans remain unresolved. While morphological studies favor their monophyly, molecular investigations do not. To evaluate these opposing conclusions, parsimony analyses were conducted with three separate sets of DNA sequences from both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes and one file of morphological data for archontans and other eutherian mammals. Statistical tests of character support and ordinal branching pattern differences documented that the three sets of DNA sequences and their results were homogeneous and congruent, thereby allowing for the combination of these data into one large matrix for further phylogenetic analysis. In contrast, these same tests revealed that the combined sequence and morphological files and their topologies were in strong conflict. Archontan monophyly was supported by the morphological evidence, but this arrangement was strongly rejected by the combined DNA sequences that favored instead a grouping of Dermoptera, Primates, and Scandentia with Lagomorpha (rabbits) and Rodentia (rodents). Resolution of these significant differences will require further evaluations about the homologies and evolutionary properties of the molecular and morphological characters and about the appropriateness of the chosen phylogenetic methods, as well as the incorporation of new comparative data from both sources.
传统上被置于总目灵长总目(Archonta)中的四类真兽亚纲哺乳动物[翼手目(小型蝙蝠和大型蝙蝠)、皮翼目(鼯猴)、灵长目(灵长类动物)和树鼩目(树鼩)],从分子和形态学角度来看,都是其下纲中研究最为深入的分类单元。然而,灵长总目的目间关系仍未得到解决。形态学研究支持它们的单系性,但分子研究却不支持。为了评估这些相互矛盾的结论,我们使用了来自核基因组和线粒体基因组的三组独立DNA序列以及一组灵长总目和其他真兽亚纲哺乳动物的形态学数据进行简约分析。对性状支持度和目分支模式差异的统计检验表明,这三组DNA序列及其结果是同质且一致的,因此可以将这些数据合并到一个大矩阵中进行进一步的系统发育分析。相比之下,同样的检验显示,合并后的序列和形态学文件及其拓扑结构存在强烈冲突。形态学证据支持灵长总目的单系性,但这种排列被合并后的DNA序列强烈否定,后者反而支持皮翼目、灵长目和树鼩目与兔形目(兔子)和啮齿目(啮齿动物)归为一组。要解决这些显著差异,需要进一步评估分子和形态学性状的同源性和进化特性、所选系统发育方法的适用性,以及纳入来自这两个来源的新的比较数据。