Suppr超能文献

血管性痴呆不同诊断标准(ADDTC、DSM-IV、ICD-10、NINDS-AIREN)的比较。

Comparison of different diagnostic criteria for vascular dementia (ADDTC, DSM-IV, ICD-10, NINDS-AIREN).

作者信息

Wetterling T, Kanitz R D, Borgis K J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University School of Medicine, Lübeck, FRG.

出版信息

Stroke. 1996 Jan;27(1):30-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.1.30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vascular dementia (VD) has been an ill-defined term thus far. Recently detailed criteria for the diagnosis of VD have been proposed (Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers [ADDTC], 1992; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition [DSM-IV], 1994; International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision [ICD-10], 1992, 1993; and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences [NINDS-AIREN], 1993). Until now the clinical feasibility of these diagnostic guidelines has not been evaluated.

METHODS

This study aimed to compare these criteria in an unselected sample of 167 elderly patients (mean age, 72.0 +/- 9.9 years) admitted with probable dementia.

RESULTS

The number of cases that could be classified as VD differed widely between the various diagnostic guidelines. According to DSM-IV criteria, 45 cases were diagnosed as VD. Twenty-one cases fulfilled the ICD-10 research criteria, but only 12 met the NINDS-AIREN criteria for VD. Twenty-three cases were classified as ischemic VD as defined by the ADDTC criteria. The concordance was very poor since only 5 cases met the criteria for VD of all diagnostic guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the classification according to different diagnostic guidelines yields rather distinct groups of patients. The reasons responsible for these findings are as follows: (1) different criteria for dementia, (2) limitation to ischemic VD in the ADDTC criteria, (3) no further differentiation of VD into subtypes according to CT or MRI findings (DSM-IV), and (4) the multifactorial etiopathology of VD. Major diagnostic difficulties ensue from the very frequent cases with white matter lesions, since their etiology and classification remain widely unknown.

摘要

背景与目的

迄今为止,血管性痴呆(VD)一直是一个定义不明确的术语。最近已提出了详细的VD诊断标准(阿尔茨海默病诊断与治疗中心[ADDTC],1992年;《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第4版[DSM-IV],1994年;《国际疾病分类》第10版[ICD-10],1992年、1993年;以及美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所-国际神经科学研究与教学协会[NINDS-AIREN],1993年)。到目前为止,这些诊断指南的临床可行性尚未得到评估。

方法

本研究旨在对167例可能患有痴呆的老年患者(平均年龄72.0±9.9岁)的未选择样本中的这些标准进行比较。

结果

在各种诊断指南中,可归类为VD的病例数差异很大。根据DSM-IV标准,45例被诊断为VD。21例符合ICD-10研究标准,但只有12例符合NINDS-AIREN的VD标准。23例根据ADDTC标准被归类为缺血性VD。一致性非常差,因为只有5例符合所有诊断指南的VD标准。

结论

我们的结果表明,根据不同诊断指南进行分类会产生截然不同的患者群体。造成这些结果的原因如下:(1)痴呆的标准不同;(2)ADDTC标准中仅限于缺血性VD;(3)未根据CT或MRI结果将VD进一步分为亚型(DSM-IV);(4)VD的多因素病因学。白质病变非常常见的病例带来了主要的诊断困难,因为它们的病因和分类仍然广泛未知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验