Suppr超能文献

不可切除食管癌不同治疗方法的比较。

Comparison of different treatments for unresectable esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Reed C E

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 1995 Nov-Dec;19(6):828-35. doi: 10.1007/BF00299779.

Abstract

Many patient with esophageal cancer have advanced disease that in not amenable to curative treatment. For these individuals the relief of dysphagia is of utmost importance to the quality of their remaining survival time. This article reviews and compares the methods of palliation with focus on indications and contraindications, advantages as well as disadvantages of each technique, success rates, and complications. Tumor characteristics, the physician's experience, the institution's capabilities, cost, and patient preference will influence choice of palliation. Methods are often complementary rather than competitive.

摘要

许多食管癌患者病情已发展到晚期,无法进行根治性治疗。对于这些患者而言,缓解吞咽困难对于提高其剩余生存期的生活质量至关重要。本文回顾并比较了姑息治疗方法,重点关注每种技术的适应证和禁忌证、优缺点、成功率及并发症。肿瘤特征、医生经验、机构能力、成本及患者偏好都会影响姑息治疗方法的选择。这些方法通常相互补充而非相互竞争。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验