Scientific and letter fraud in the Victorian era.
作者信息
Edouard L
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Dec 16;311(7020):1644. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7020.1644.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scientific and letter fraud in the Victorian era.维多利亚时代的科学与信件造假。
BMJ. 1995 Dec 16;311(7020):1644. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7020.1644.
2
[The N-rays were imagined, but the research was no fraud].
Lakartidningen. 2016 Oct 18;113:EA49.
3
A question of intent: when is a 'schematic' illustration a fraud?意图问题：“示意性”插图何时构成欺诈？
Nature. 2001 Mar 8;410(6825):144. doi: 10.1038/35065834.
4
Suspended judgment. Is the scientific paper a fraud?暂缓判断。这篇科学论文是欺诈之作吗？
Control Clin Trials. 1991 Apr;12(2):273-6. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(91)90024-g.
5
Medical and scientific fraud.医学与科学欺诈。
N Z Med J. 1994 Jun 8;107(979):216-7.
6
UK consultant censured for failure to act on junior's research fraud.英国顾问因未对初级人员的研究欺诈行为采取行动而受到谴责。
Lancet. 2001 Mar 10;357(9258):780. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71213-7.
7
[Scientific fraud].[科学欺诈]
Medicina (B Aires). 2016;76(6):410.
8
Editorial.社论。
Brain. 2019 Jul 1;142(7):1847. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz173.
9
Re-reconsidering Burt: beyond a reasonable doubt.重新审视伯特：排除合理怀疑。
J Hist Behav Sci. 1997 Spring;33(2):145-62. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6696(199721)33:2<145::aid-jhbs6>3.0.co;2-s.
10
[Fraud and pharmacist: an old companionship from Antiquity to nowadays].
Rev Hist Pharm (Paris). 2014 Jun;62(382):175-84.
本文引用的文献
1
Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.皮尔斯事件的教训：处理科学欺诈行为
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1547-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1547.
2
Letter fraud.信件欺诈。
BMJ. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):523-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.523.
Zotero 插件