Tebbenjohanns J, Pfeiffer D, Schumacher B, Jung W, Manz M, Lüderitz B
Department of Cardiology, University of Bonn, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995 Sep;6(9):711-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1995.tb00447.x.
The mechanisms whereby radiofrequency catheter modification of AV nodal conduction slows the ventricular response are not well defined. Whether a successful modification procedure can be achieved by ablating posterior inputs to the AV node or by partial ablation of the compact AV node is unclear. We hypothesized that ablation of the well-defined slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia would slow the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation.
In 34 patients with dual AV physiology and inducible AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrial fibrillation was induced at baseline and immediately after successful slow pathway ablation and at 1-week follow-up. The minimal, maximal, and mean RR intervals during atrial fibrillation increased from 353 +/- 76, 500 +/- 121, and 405 +/- 91 msec to 429 +/- 84 (P < 0.01), 673 +/- 161 (P < 0.01), and 535 +/- 98 msec (P < 0.01), respectively. These effects remained stable during follow-up at 1 week. The AV block cycle length increased from 343 +/- 68 msec to 375 +/- 60 msec (P < 0.05) immediately and to 400 +/- 56 msec (P < 0.01) at 1-week follow-up. The effective refractory period of the AV node prolonged from 282 +/- 83 msec to 312 +/- 89 msec and to 318 +/- 81 msec after 1 week (P < 0.05), respectively.
This study shows a decrease in ventricular response to pacing-induced atrial fibrillation after ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Since the AV nodal conduction properties could be defined, this study supports the hypothesis that the main mechanism of AV nodal modification in chronic atrial fibrillation is caused by ablation of posterior inputs to the AV node.
射频导管改良房室结传导从而减慢心室反应的机制尚未完全明确。通过消融房室结的后部传入纤维或部分消融致密房室结能否成功完成改良手术尚不清楚。我们推测,对于房室结折返性心动过速患者,消融明确的慢径路可减慢房颤时的心室反应。
34例具有双房室生理特性且可诱发房室结折返性心动过速的患者,在基线时、成功消融慢径路后即刻以及随访1周时诱发房颤。房颤时的最小、最大和平均RR间期分别从353±76、500±121和405±91毫秒增加至429±84毫秒(P<0.01)、673±161毫秒(P<0.01)和535±98毫秒(P<0.01)。这些效应在1周的随访期间保持稳定。房室传导阻滞周期长度即刻从343±68毫秒增加至375±60毫秒(P<0.05),在随访1周时增加至400±56毫秒(P<0.01)。房室结的有效不应期从282±83毫秒延长至312±89毫秒,并在1周后延长至318±81毫秒(P<0.05)。
本研究表明,房室结折返性心动过速患者消融慢径路后,对起搏诱发房颤的心室反应降低。由于可以明确房室结传导特性,本研究支持以下假说:慢性房颤时房室结改良的主要机制是消融房室结的后部传入纤维。